Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

China's copyright protection for audio-visual works - a comparison with Europe and the U.S.
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SONG SA-II10
Henkilönnimi
  • Song, Seagull Haiyan.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • China's copyright protection for audio-visual works - a comparison with Europe and the U.S.
Julkaistu
  • 2015.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • 410-438.
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 46 (4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • One of the most heated debates in the current Chinese Copyright Law Revision is copyright protection of films. Individual creators/authors of films (such as a film director or script writer) have criticized the current rule, which vests copyright ownership of a film with the producer of a film, as depriving them of a fair opportunity to share in the commercial success of their work. As a result, the guilds representing individual creators have been lobbying to change the current “producer-ownership” rule to “individual creator-ownership” model, or as an alternative, leaving copyright ownership of films to be decided by contract. Not surprisingly, movie studios are objecting to such a proposed change. To build a successful movie industry, China is looking for inspiration from the Hollywood model - the U.S. copyright protection of films. Yet because China’s copyright system is based on the Continental European model, a comparison with its origin - France and Germany - seems inevitable. This paper compares copyright protection of films in France, Germany and the U.S. with China (from its first Copyright Law in 1999, its subsequent revisions until the most recent one), in terms of film authorship, ownership and remuneration scheme. In the end, the author proposes a hybrid model for China – reserving the Continental European concept of moral rights for individual authors, while vesting ownership of a film with the producer of a film, and at the same time, introducing a more balanced remuneration scheme for individual creators in a film.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
*00002566nab a22003134a 4500
*00110068
*00520201106111822.0
*007tu
*008150810s2015\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035  $a22673
*035  $a(PLib-conv)0000022673
*0410 $aeng
*090  $aOMA:SA-II10
*1001 $aSong, Seagull Haiyan.
*24510$aChina's copyright protection for audio-visual works - a comparison with Europe and the U.S. /$cSeagull Haiyan Song.
*260  $c2015.
*300  $a410-438.
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v46 (4)
*520  $aOne of the most heated debates in the current Chinese Copyright Law Revision is copyright protection of films. Individual creators/authors of films (such as a film director or script writer) have criticized the current rule, which vests copyright ownership of a film with the producer of a film, as depriving them of a fair opportunity to share in the commercial success of their work. As a result, the guilds representing individual creators have been lobbying to change the current “producer-ownership” rule to “individual creator-ownership” model, or as an alternative, leaving copyright ownership of films to be decided by contract. Not surprisingly, movie studios are objecting to such a proposed change. To build a successful movie industry, China is looking for inspiration from the Hollywood model - the U.S. copyright protection of films. Yet because China’s copyright system is based on the Continental European model, a comparison with its origin - France and Germany - seems inevitable. This paper compares copyright protection of films in France, Germany and the U.S. with China (from its first Copyright Law in 1999, its subsequent revisions until the most recent one), in terms of film authorship, ownership and remuneration scheme. In the end, the author proposes a hybrid model for China – reserving the Continental European concept of moral rights for individual authors, while vesting ownership of a film with the producer of a film, and at the same time, introducing a more balanced remuneration scheme for individual creators in a film.
*653  $aKIINA
*653  $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653  $aAUDIOVISUAALINEN
*653  $aEUROOPPA
*653  $aYHDYSVALLAT
*653  $aELOKUVAAMISOIKEUS
*653  $aMORAALISET OIKEUDET
*8102 $aIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v4
*852  $hSA-II10$cSONG
*979  $a0000022673
*999  $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
22804Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoVarasto SA-IIC