Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Development of hosting ISP's secondary liability for primary copyright infringement in China - as compared to the US and German routes
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 46 (3)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. This article takes a comparative approach to studying the development of hosting ISPs secondary liability in China, namely by referring to relevant rules in the US and Germany as examples. In particular, this article compares how the courts interpret the main imputed factors in these three jurisdictions such as monitoring responsibility, knowledge of infringement, measures against repeating infringement, benefit from infringement, and inducement. Through the aforesaid comparison, this article notes that the development of hosting ISPs secondary liability in China has been deeply affected by the relevant rules in the US and Germany, but it is also marked with its own characteristics such as requiring the hosting ISP to exert a higher level of duty of care on hot-play films and television dramas, and famous works. Moreover, this comparison also reveals that although China, the US, and Germany mainly rely on different approaches to solve hosting ISPs secondary liability, the recent case decisions in these three jurisdictions have shown some common tendencies, for example, receiving benefits has become a less important imputed factor, and the courts tend to pay more attention to hosting ISPs intent and commercial model when deciding liability.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
*00002262nab a22003134a 4500
*00110074
*00520201106111822.0
*007tu
*008150810s2015\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a22679
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000022679
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-II10
*1001 $aWang, Jie.
*24510$aDevelopment of hosting ISP's secondary liability for primary copyright infringement in China - as compared to the US and German routes /$cJie Wang.
*260 $c2015.
*300 $a275-309.
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v46 (3)
*520 $aThis article takes a comparative approach to studying the development of hosting ISPs secondary liability in China, namely by referring to relevant rules in the US and Germany as examples. In particular, this article compares how the courts interpret the main imputed factors in these three jurisdictions such as monitoring responsibility, knowledge of infringement, measures against repeating infringement, benefit from infringement, and inducement. Through the aforesaid comparison, this article notes that the development of hosting ISPs secondary liability in China has been deeply affected by the relevant rules in the US and Germany, but it is also marked with its own characteristics such as requiring the hosting ISP to exert a higher level of duty of care on hot-play films and television dramas, and famous works. Moreover, this comparison also reveals that although China, the US, and Germany mainly rely on different approaches to solve hosting ISPs secondary liability, the recent case decisions in these three jurisdictions have shown some common tendencies, for example, receiving benefits has become a less important imputed factor, and the courts tend to pay more attention to hosting ISPs intent and commercial model when deciding liability.
*653 $aKIINA
*653 $aYHDYSVALLAT
*653 $aSAKSA
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653 $aKAUPALLISUUS
*653 $aVÄÄRINKÄYTTÖ
*653 $aVASTUU
*653 $aVERKKOPALVELUNTARJOAJAT
*8102 $aIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v3
*852 $hSA-II10$cWANG
*979 $a0000022679
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.