Hylly
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Christian Liffers v. Producciones Mandarina SL and Mediaset España Comunicación SA Directive 2004/48/EC, Art. 13(1) : Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 17 March 2016 - Case No. C-99/15.
Julkaistu
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 47 (5)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Article 13(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights must be interpreted as permitting a party injured by an intellectual property infringement , who claims compensation for his material damage as calculated, in accordance with heading (b) of the second subparagraph of Article 13(1) of that directive, on the basis of the amount of royalties or fees which would have been due to him if the infringer had requested his authorisation to use that right, also to claim compensation for the moral prejudice that he has suffered, as provided for under heading (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 13(1) of that directive.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-016-0492-7
*00002021nab a22003614a 4500
*00110777
*00520201106111827.0
*007tu
*008160822s2016\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a23459
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000023459
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-II10
*24500$aChristian Liffers v. Producciones Mandarina SL and Mediaset España Comunicación SA Directive 2004/48/EC, Art. 13(1) :$bDecision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 17 March 2016 - Case No. C-99/15.
*260 $c2016.
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v47 (5)
*520 $aArticle 13(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights must be interpreted as permitting a party injured by an intellectual property infringement , who claims compensation for his material damage as calculated, in accordance with heading (b) of the second subparagraph of Article 13(1) of that directive, on the basis of the amount of royalties or fees which would have been due to him if the infringer had requested his authorisation to use that right, also to claim compensation for the moral prejudice that he has suffered, as provided for under heading (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 13(1) of that directive.
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUSRIKKOMUS
*653 $aTUOMIOISTUIMET
*653 $aEU-OIKEUS
*653 $aAUDIOVISUAALINEN AINEISTO
*653 $aVAHINGONKORVAUS
*653 $aVAHINGOT
*653 $aMORAALISET OIKEUDET
*653 $aAUDIOVISUAL WORK
*653 $aINFRINGEMENT
*653 $aDAMAGES
*653 $aCALCULTAION OF COMPENSATION
*8102 $aIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v5
*852 $hSA-II10$cCHRISTIAN
*85640$uhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-016-0492-7
*979 $a0000023459
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.