Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö The Ninth Circuits Decision in Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena : The Invocation of the Act of State Doctrine and its Implications for Future Nazi-Stolen Art Claims
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, ISSN 0736-7694 ; 34(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä INTRODUCTION ......... 526 I. THE NAZI ART CONFISCATION PROGRAM AND THE POST-WAR RESTITUTION INITIATIVES ........ 529 II. THE STORY OF JACQUES GOUDSTIKKER AND THE GOUDSTIKKER COLLECTION, THE ACQUISITION OF THE CRANACHS, AND THE ORIGINS OF VON SAHER V. NORTON SIMON MUSEUM OF ART AT PASADENA....... 532 A. Jacques Goudstikker Acquires the Cranachs........... 532 B. The Forced Sale to the Nazis........... 533 C. The Post-War Fate of the Cranachs........... 534 D. The Stroganoff Restitution Claim with the Dutch Government . 536 III. THE COMMENCEMENT OF VON SAHER V. NORTON SIMON MUSEUM OF ART AT PASADENA AND ITS COMPLICATED PROCEDURAL HISTORY.... 537 A. The District Court Proceeding ........ 537 B. The First Appeal to the Ninth Circuit......... 539 C. The California Legislature Amends Section 338(c)... 540 D. The Ninth Circuits Second Decision ...... 542 E. The Ninth Circuit Invokes the Act of State Doctrine......... 544 IV. THE SUPREME COURTS DENIAL OF THE NORTON SIMON MUSEUMS PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND THE IMPLICATION OF THE NINTH CIRCUITS RULING ON FUTURE RESTITUTION CLAIMS........... 545 V. THE CRITICAL ISSUE: IS THE ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE IMPLICATED IN VON SAHER? .... 547 CONCLUSION....... 553
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 0736-7694 ; 34(2)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) http://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Wolf-Von-Saher.pdf Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*00002330nab a22003254a 4500
*00111162
*00520201106111828.0
*007tu
*008170117s2016\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a23850
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000023850
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-CA30
*1001 $aWolf, Erica.
*24510$aThe Ninth Circuits Decision in Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena :$bThe Invocation of the Act of State Doctrine and its Implications for Future Nazi-Stolen Art Claims /$cErica Wolf.
*260 $c2016.
*300 $a525-554.
*4901 $aCardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,$x0736-7694 ;$v34(2)
*505 $aINTRODUCTION ......... 526 I. THE NAZI ART CONFISCATION PROGRAM AND THE POST-WAR RESTITUTION INITIATIVES ........ 529 II. THE STORY OF JACQUES GOUDSTIKKER AND THE GOUDSTIKKER COLLECTION, THE ACQUISITION OF THE CRANACHS, AND THE ORIGINS OF VON SAHER V. NORTON SIMON MUSEUM OF ART AT PASADENA....... 532 A. Jacques Goudstikker Acquires the Cranachs........... 532 B. The Forced Sale to the Nazis........... 533 C. The Post-War Fate of the Cranachs........... 534 D. The Stroganoff Restitution Claim with the Dutch Government . 536 III. THE COMMENCEMENT OF VON SAHER V. NORTON SIMON MUSEUM OF ART AT PASADENA AND ITS COMPLICATED PROCEDURAL HISTORY.... 537 A. The District Court Proceeding ........ 537 B. The First Appeal to the Ninth Circuit......... 539 C. The California Legislature Amends Section 338(c)... 540 D. The Ninth Circuits Second Decision ...... 542 E. The Ninth Circuit Invokes the Act of State Doctrine......... 544 IV. THE SUPREME COURTS DENIAL OF THE NORTON SIMON MUSEUMS PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND THE IMPLICATION OF THE NINTH CIRCUITS RULING ON FUTURE RESTITUTION CLAIMS........... 545 V. THE CRITICAL ISSUE: IS THE ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE IMPLICATED IN VON SAHER? .... 547 CONCLUSION....... 553
*653 $aTAIDE
*653 $aTAIDETEOKSET
*653 $aVARKAUS
*653 $aOMISTAJUUS
*653 $aOMISTUSOIKEUS
*653 $aVAATIMUKSET
*830 0$aCardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,$x0736-7694 ;$v34(2)
*852 $hSA-CA30$cWOLF
*85641$uhttp://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Wolf-Von-Saher.pdf$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
*979 $a0000023850
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.