Tervetuloa kirjastoon!

*00003656cam a22004094i 4500
*00111457
*00520230912023113.0
*008140307s2013    xxu||||| b   |||| 0|eng|c
*020  $a978-0-8122-4484-7$c32,94$qkovakantinen
*020  $a978-0-8122-2332-3$qpehmeäkantinen
*035  $a(FI-MELINDA)006644556
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aSluga, Glenda,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aInternationalism in the age of nationalism /$cGlenda Sluga.
*260  $aPhiladelphia :$bUniversity of Pennsylvania Press,$ccop. 2013.
*300  $a211 pages
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aPennsylvania studies in human rights
*500  $aValt. tdk: Yhteiskunnallinen muutos: YKP-241A Kansainvälinen historia
*504  $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
*5050 $aThe international turn -- Imagine Geneva, between the wars -- The apogee of internationalism -- What is the international? -- Afterword: the national in the age of internationalism.
*520  $aThe twentieth century, a time of profound disillusionment with nationalism, was also the great age of internationalism. To the twenty-first-century historian, the period from the late nineteenth century until the end of the Cold War is distinctive for its nationalist preoccupations, while internationalism is often construed as the purview of ideologues and idealists, a remnant of Enlightenment-era narratives of the progress of humanity into a global community. Glenda Sluga argues to the contrary, that the concepts of nationalism and internationalism were very much entwined throughout the twentieth century and mutually shaped the attitudes toward interdependence and transnationalism that influence global politics in the present day. Internationalism in the Age of Nationalism traces the arc of internationalism through its rise before World War I, its apogee at the end of World War II, its reprise in the global seventies and the post-Cold War nineties, and its decline after 9/11. Drawing on original archival material and contemporary accounts, Sluga focuses on specific moments when visions of global community occupied the liberal political mainstream, often through the maneuvers of iconic organizations such as the League of Nations and the United Nations, which stood for the sovereignty of nation-states while creating the conditions under which marginalized colonial subjects and women could make their voices heard in an international arena. In this retelling of the history of the twentieth century, conceptions of sovereignty, community, and identity were the objects of trade and reinvention among diverse intellectual and social communities, and internationalism was imagined as the means of national independence and national rights, as well as the antidote to nationalism.
*648 7$a1900-luku$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6190061999
*648 7$a1900-talet$2yso/swe$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6190061999
*650 0$aNationalism$xPsychological aspects.
*650 0$aNationalism$xHistory$y20th century.
*650 0$aInternationalism$xPsychological aspects.
*650 0$aInternationalism$xHistory$y20th century.
*650 7$ahistoria$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1780
*650 7$anationalismi$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1822
*650 7$akansainvälisyys$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3868
*650 7$ahistoria$2yso/swe$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1780
*650 7$anationalism$2yso/swe$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1822
*650 7$ainternationalism$2yso/swe$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3868
*830 0$aPennsylvania studies in human rights.
^

Kuvausta ei toistaiseksi saatavana