Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Huawei v. ZTE in Context : EU Competition Policy and Collaborative Standardization in Wireless Telecommunications
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 48 (2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Collaborative standardization, an efficient and inclusive form of organized innovation under the auspices of standard-setting organisations (SSOs), has demonstrated significant technological achievements in the field of wireless telecommunications. At the core of collaborative standardization is a working balance of interests and incentives of all stakeholders involved, i.e. contributors of technology and users of standards, epitomized by licensing on FRAND terms. Standardization contributes to significant gains in consumer welfare, in the form of lower prices, more innovation and more consumer choice and convenience. At the same time, standardization fosters competitive markets, upstream and downstream. Public policy has not always been successful in accommodating collaborative standardization. The enforcement of Art. 102 TFEU by the EU Commission, for instance, reveals an underlying mistrust of the operation of markets in the context of collaborative standardization and a strong preference for court-determined FRAND terms. However, the recent CJEU ruling in Huawei v. ZTE provides strong incentives for private stakeholders to determine FRAND through bilateral commercial negotiations and as such it is a welcome shift in EU competition policy in collaborative standardization.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
*00002205nab a22002654a 4500
*00111557
*00520201106111831.0
*007tu
*008170522s2017\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a24253
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000024253
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-II10
*1001 $aTsilikas, Huawei.
*24510$aHuawei v. ZTE in Context :$bEU Competition Policy and Collaborative Standardization in Wireless Telecommunications /$cHuawei Tsilikas.
*260 $c2017.
*300 $a151-178.
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v48 (2)
*520 $aCollaborative standardization, an efficient and inclusive form of organized innovation under the auspices of standard-setting organisations (SSOs), has demonstrated significant technological achievements in the field of wireless telecommunications. At the core of collaborative standardization is a working balance of interests and incentives of all stakeholders involved, i.e. contributors of technology and users of standards, epitomized by licensing on FRAND terms. Standardization contributes to significant gains in consumer welfare, in the form of lower prices, more innovation and more consumer choice and convenience. At the same time, standardization fosters competitive markets, upstream and downstream. Public policy has not always been successful in accommodating collaborative standardization. The enforcement of Art. 102 TFEU by the EU Commission, for instance, reveals an underlying mistrust of the operation of markets in the context of collaborative standardization and a strong preference for court-determined FRAND terms. However, the recent CJEU ruling in Huawei v. ZTE provides strong incentives for private stakeholders to determine FRAND through bilateral commercial negotiations and as such it is a welcome shift in EU competition policy in collaborative standardization.
*599 $bpdf informaatikolla.
*653 $aSTANDARDIT
*653 $aLANGATON YHTEYS
*8102 $aIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v2
*852 $hSA-II10$cTSILIKAS
*979 $a0000024253
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.