Hylly
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Decision of the European Court of Justice: GS Media : GS Media BV v. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV, Playboy Enterprises International Inc., and Britt Geertruida Dekker Directive 2001/29/EC, Art. 3(1).
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 48 (3)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to establish whether the fact of posting, on a website, hyperlinks to protected works, which are freely available on another website without the consent of the copyright holder, constitutes a communication to the public within the meaning of that provision, it is to be determined whether those links are provided without the pursuit of financial gain by a person who did not know or could not reasonably have known the illegal nature of the publication of those works on that other website or whether, on the contrary, those links are provided for such a purpose, a situation in which that knowledge must be presumed. Decision of the European Court of Justice (Second Chamber); 8 September 2016 Case No. C-160/15
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
*00002001nab a22002894a 4500
*00111642
*00520201106111832.0
*007tu
*008170919s2017\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a24341
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000024341
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-II10
*24500$aDecision of the European Court of Justice: GS Media :$bGS Media BV v. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV, Playboy Enterprises International Inc., and Britt Geertruida Dekker Directive 2001/29/EC, Art. 3(1).
*260 $c2017.
*300 $a342.
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v48 (3)
*520 $aArticle 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to establish whether the fact of posting, on a website, hyperlinks to protected works, which are freely available on another website without the consent of the copyright holder, constitutes a communication to the public within the meaning of that provision, it is to be determined whether those links are provided without the pursuit of financial gain by a person who did not know or could not reasonably have known the illegal nature of the publication of those works on that other website or whether, on the contrary, those links are provided for such a purpose, a situation in which that knowledge must be presumed. Decision of the European Court of Justice (Second Chamber); 8 September 2016 Case No. C-160/15
*599 $bpdf informaatikolla.
*653 $aYLEISÖLLE VÄLITTÄMINEN
*653 $aLINKIT
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUSRIKKOMUS
*653 $aSUOSTUMUS
*653 $aEUROOPPAOIKEUS
*8102 $aIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v3
*852 $hSA-II10$cDECISION
*979 $a0000024341
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.