Hylly
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Decision of the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht): Metall auf Metall : Constitution, Arts. 3, 5(1), first sentence, 14. Copyright Act, Secs. 85(4), 24.
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 48 (3)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. 1.The application of standards specific to art required by Art. 5(3), first sentence, of the Constitution stipulates that the adoption of excerpts of copyrighted subject-matter must be recognised as means of artistic expression and design. If this freedom of development stands in opposition to an infringement of copyright or related rights that only minimally restricts the possibilities for exploitation, then the right holders interests in exploitation may have to give way to artistic freedom. 2.The protection of property cannot lead to making the use of equivalently duplicable samples of a phonogram generally dependent on authorisation by the phonogram producer, as this does not take due account of the artists creative process. 3.When monitoring the application of EU law by a non-constitutional court, the Federal Constitutional Court examines in particular whether that court has prevented impending violations of fundamental rights by a referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union and whether the inalienable minimum standard for fundamental rights laid down in the Constitution is observed.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
*00002171nab a22003134a 4500
*00111643
*00520201106111832.0
*007tu
*008170919s2017\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a24342
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000024342
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-II10
*24500$aDecision of the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht): Metall auf Metall :$bConstitution, Arts. 3, 5(1), first sentence, 14. Copyright Act, Secs. 85(4), 24.
*260 $c2017.
*300 $a343.
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v48 (3)
*520 $a1.The application of standards specific to art required by Art. 5(3), first sentence, of the Constitution stipulates that the adoption of excerpts of copyrighted subject-matter must be recognised as means of artistic expression and design. If this freedom of development stands in opposition to an infringement of copyright or related rights that only minimally restricts the possibilities for exploitation, then the right holders interests in exploitation may have to give way to artistic freedom. 2.The protection of property cannot lead to making the use of equivalently duplicable samples of a phonogram generally dependent on authorisation by the phonogram producer, as this does not take due account of the artists creative process. 3.When monitoring the application of EU law by a non-constitutional court, the Federal Constitutional Court examines in particular whether that court has prevented impending violations of fundamental rights by a referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union and whether the inalienable minimum standard for fundamental rights laid down in the Constitution is observed.
*599 $bpdf informaatikolla.
*653 $aSAKSA
*653 $aSAMPLAUS
*653 $aKEHITTÄMINEN
*653 $aKEHITTÄMISPROJEKTIT
*653 $aTAITEELLINEN TYÖ
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUSRIKKOMUS
*653 $aPERUSOIKEUDET
*8102 $aIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v3
*852 $cDECISION
*979 $a0000024342
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.