Hylly
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Decision of the European Court of Justice (Second Chamber); 22 September 2016. Case No. C-110/15. the European Court of Justice: Nokia Italia and Others : Microsoft Mobile Sales International Oy (formerly Nokia Italia SpA), Hewlett-Packard Italiana Srl, Telecom Italia SpA, Samsung Electronics Italia SpA, Dell SpA, Fastweb SpA, Sony Mobile Communications Italy SpA and Wind Telecomunicazioni SpA v. Ministero per i beni e le attività culturali (MIBAC), Società italiana degli autori ed editori (SIAE), Istituto per la tutela dei diritti degli artisti interpreti esecutori (IMAIE), Associazione nazionale industrie cinematografiche audiovisive e multimediali (ANICA) and Associazione produttori televisivi (APT) Directive 2001/29/EC (InfoSoc-Directive), Art. 5(2)(b).
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 48 (4)
Yleinen huomautus Teksti kokonaisuudessaan kirjastojärjestelmän tekstikentässä.
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. 1.EU law, in particular, Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, that, on the one hand, subjects exemption from payment of the private copying levy for producers and importers of devices and media intended for use clearly unrelated to private copying to the conclusion of agreements between an entity which has a legal monopoly on the representation of the interests of authors of works, and those liable to pay compensation, or their trade associations, and, on the other hand, provides that the reimbursement of such a levy, where it has been unduly paid, may be requested only by the final user of those devices and media.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
*00002497nab a22002774a 4500
*00111648
*00520201106111832.0
*007tu
*008170920s2017\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a24348
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000024348
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-II10
*24500$aDecision of the European Court of Justice (Second Chamber); 22 September 2016. Case No. C-110/15. the European Court of Justice: Nokia Italia and Others :$bMicrosoft Mobile Sales International Oy (formerly Nokia Italia SpA), Hewlett-Packard Italiana Srl, Telecom Italia SpA, Samsung Electronics Italia SpA, Dell SpA, Fastweb SpA, Sony Mobile Communications Italy SpA and Wind Telecomunicazioni SpA v. Ministero per i beni e le attività culturali (MIBAC), Società italiana degli autori ed editori (SIAE), Istituto per la tutela dei diritti degli artisti interpreti esecutori (IMAIE), Associazione nazionale industrie cinematografiche audiovisive e multimediali (ANICA) and Associazione produttori televisivi (APT) Directive 2001/29/EC (InfoSoc-Directive), Art. 5(2)(b).
*260 $c2017.
*300 $a468.
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v48 (4)
*500 $aTeksti kokonaisuudessaan kirjastojärjestelmän tekstikentässä.
*520 $a1.EU law, in particular, Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, that, on the one hand, subjects exemption from payment of the private copying levy for producers and importers of devices and media intended for use clearly unrelated to private copying to the conclusion of agreements between an entity which has a legal monopoly on the representation of the interests of authors of works, and those liable to pay compensation, or their trade associations, and, on the other hand, provides that the reimbursement of such a levy, where it has been unduly paid, may be requested only by the final user of those devices and media.
*653 $aYKSITYINEN KÄYTTÖ
*653 $aKOPIOINTI
*653 $aVEROTUS
*653 $aKORVAUKSET
*8102 $aIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v4
*852 $hSA-II10$cDECISION
*979 $a0000024348
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.