Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

 
Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data : Between Propertisation and Access
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • DREXL SA-JIPI
Henkilönnimi
  • Drexl, Josef.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data : Between Propertisation and Access
Julkaistu
  • 2017.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • 257-292.
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, ISSN 2190-3387 ; 8 (4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart driverless cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-8-4-2017/4636/JIPITEC_8_4_2017_257_Drexl Linkki verkkoaineistoon 
*00003567nab a22005414a 4500
*00111947
*00520201106111833.0
*008171227s2017\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035  $a24660
*035  $a(PLib-conv)0000024660
*0410 $aeng
*090  $aOMA:SA-JIPI
*1001 $aDrexl, Josef.
*24510$aDesigning Competitive Markets for Industrial Data :$bBetween Propertisation and Access /$cJosef Drexl.
*260  $c2017.
*300  $a257-292.
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v8 (4)
*520  $aAs part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart driverless cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017.
*653  $aTIETO
*653  $aTIEDONSAANTI
*653  $aOMISTAJUUS
*653  $aOMISTUS
*653  $aEU
*653  $aEUROOPAN UNIONI
*653  $aKILPAILUOIKEUS
*653  $aESINEIDEN INTERNET
*653  $aJAKAMINEN
*653  $aJAKAMISTALOUS
*653  $aLISENSSIT
*653  $aLIIKESALAISUUDET
*653  $aDATA OWNERSHIP
*653  $aEU COMPETITION LAW
*653  $aINTERNET OF THINGS
*653  $aACCESS TO DATA
*653  $aDATA ANALYTICS
*653  $aDATA ECONOMY
*653  $aDATA PORTABILITY
*653  $aDATA SHARING
*653  $aDATA-DRIVEN ECONOMY
*653  $aDATABASE RIGHTS
*653  $aESSENTIAL FACILITIES
*653  $aREFUSAL TO LICENSE
*653  $aTRADE SECRETS PROTECTION
*8102 $aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v8(4)
*852  $hSA-JIPI$cDREXL
*85640$uhttps://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-8-4-2017/4636/JIPITEC_8_4_2017_257_Drexl$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
*979  $a0000024660
*999  $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä