Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Non-Commercial Quotation and Freedom of Panorama : Useful and Lawful?
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, ISSN 2190-3387 ; 8(4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. This contribution seeks to assess both the practical implications and lawfulness of national copyright exceptions that lacking a corresponding provision in Article 5 of Directive 2001/29 (the InfoSoc Directive) envisage that the only permitted use of a copyright work for the sake of the applicability of a certain exception is a non-commercial one. By referring to different national exceptions allowing quotation and freedom of panorama as case studies, the paper shows some of the shortcomings deriving from different approaches to the same permitted uses of copyright works across the EU, as well as the resulting (negative) impact on the very objective underlying adoption of the InfoSoc Directive: harmonization. This contribution concludes that in general terms diverging approaches to copyright exceptions, including limiting the availability of certain exceptions to non-commercial uses, may be both impractical and contrary to the system established by the InfoSoc Directive.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-8-4-2017/4639/JIPITEC_8_4_2017_311_Rosati Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*00002339nab a22004094a 4500
*00111950
*00520201106111833.0
*008171227s2017\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a24663
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000024663
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-JIPI
*1001 $aRosati, Eleonora.
*24510$aNon-Commercial Quotation and Freedom of Panorama :$bUseful and Lawful? /$cEleonora Rosati.
*260 $c2017.
*300 $a311-321.
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v8(4)
*520 $aThis contribution seeks to assess both the practical implications and lawfulness of national copyright exceptions that lacking a corresponding provision in Article 5 of Directive 2001/29 (the InfoSoc Directive) envisage that the only permitted use of a copyright work for the sake of the applicability of a certain exception is a non-commercial one. By referring to different national exceptions allowing quotation and freedom of panorama as case studies, the paper shows some of the shortcomings deriving from different approaches to the same permitted uses of copyright works across the EU, as well as the resulting (negative) impact on the very objective underlying adoption of the InfoSoc Directive: harmonization. This contribution concludes that in general terms diverging approaches to copyright exceptions, including limiting the availability of certain exceptions to non-commercial uses, may be both impractical and contrary to the system established by the InfoSoc Directive.
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653 $aDIREKTIIVIT
*653 $aRAJOITUKSET
*653 $aPOIKKEUKSET
*653 $aSITAATIT
*653 $aARTICLE 5 INFOSOC DIRECTIVE
*653 $aCJEU
*653 $aCOPYRIGHT
*653 $aINFOSOC DIRECTIVE
*653 $aEXCEPTIONS AND LIMITATION S
*653 $aFOR-PROFIT
*653 $aFREEDOM OF PANORAMA
*653 $aNON-COMMERCIAL EXCEPTIONS AND LIMITATION S
*653 $aQUOTATION
*8102 $aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v8(4)
*852 $hSA-JIPI$cROSATI
*85640$uhttps://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-8-4-2017/4639/JIPITEC_8_4_2017_311_Rosati$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
*979 $a0000024663
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.