Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Distributed Owners hip in Music : between authorship and performance
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Social & Legal Studies, ISSN 1461-7390
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Following criticisms of British copyright law that it is influenced by Romantic ideals of authorship, I ask whether it makes sense to distinguish between music composers and performers in law. Drawing on interviews with classical and popular music performers and relevant case law, I examine how performers negotiate and exploit different rights in order to determine owners hip. Evidence suggests that rather than a binary, musicians creative work can best be represented as moving along a continuum between composition and performance with both concepts socially much in use. Musicians position their work on this continuum according to three motifs: composer-performer discourses and careers, genre and power relationships. I argue that the legal categories of joint or individual authorship, adaptation and performance protect most contributions to a musical work and align with the social understandings of different types of contributions. Yet I also note that, viewed more normatively, a recasting of the rights could help shift those social understandings and alter the inequalities inherent in both musical practices and the law.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
*00002382nab a22004694a 4500
*00111990
*00520201106111834.0
*007tu
*008180118s2017\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a24704
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000024704
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-SLS
*1001 $aAguilar, Ananay.
*24510$aDistributed Owners hip in Music :$bbetween authorship and performance /$cAnanay Aguilar.
*260 $c2017.
*300 $a1-23.
*4901 $aSocial & Legal Studies,$x1461-7390
*520 $aFollowing criticisms of British copyright law that it is influenced by Romantic ideals of authorship, I ask whether it makes sense to distinguish between music composers and performers in law. Drawing on interviews with classical and popular music performers and relevant case law, I examine how performers negotiate and exploit different rights in order to determine owners hip. Evidence suggests that rather than a binary, musicians creative work can best be represented as moving along a continuum between composition and performance with both concepts socially much in use. Musicians position their work on this continuum according to three motifs: composer-performer discourses and careers, genre and power relationships. I argue that the legal categories of joint or individual authorship, adaptation and performance protect most contributions to a musical work and align with the social understandings of different types of contributions. Yet I also note that, viewed more normatively, a recasting of the rights could help shift those social understandings and alter the inequalities inherent in both musical practices and the law.
*599 $bpdf informaatikolta.
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653 $aTEKIJYYS
*653 $aMUSIIKKI
*653 $aMUSIIKKIALA
*653 $aOMISTAJUUS
*653 $aOIKEUDENHALTIJAT
*653 $aESITTÄMINEN
*653 $aESITTÄVÄ TAITEILIJA
*653 $aOIKEUDET
*653 $aÄÄNITTEET
*653 $aADAPTATION
*653 $aCOPYRIGHT
*653 $aJOINT AUTHORSHIP
*653 $aMUSIC
*653 $aOWNERS HIP
*653 $aPERFORMANCE
*653 $aPERFORMERS RIGHTS
*653 $aROMANTIC IDEALS
*653 $aSOUND RECORDING
*653 $aYHTEISTEOKSET
*8102 $aSocial & Legal Studies,$x1461-7390
*852 $hSA-SLS$cAGUILAR
*979 $a0000024704
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.