Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

 
Distributed Ownership in Music : between authorship and performance
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • AGUILAR SA-SLS
Henkilönnimi
  • Aguilar, Ananay.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Distributed Ownership in Music : between authorship and performance
Julkaistu
  • 2017.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • 1-23.
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Social & Legal Studies, ISSN 1461-7390
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Following criticisms of British copyright law that it is influenced by Romantic ideals of authorship, I ask whether it makes sense to distinguish between music composers and performers in law. Drawing on interviews with classical and popular music performers and relevant case law, I examine how performers negotiate and exploit different rights in order to determine ownership. Evidence suggests that rather than a binary, musicians’ creative work can best be represented as moving along a continuum between composition and performance with both concepts socially much in use. Musicians position their work on this continuum according to three motifs: composer-performer discourses and careers, genre and power relationships. I argue that the legal categories of joint or individual authorship, adaptation and performance protect most contributions to a musical work and align with the social understandings of different types of contributions. Yet I also note that, viewed more normatively, a recasting of the rights could help shift those social understandings and alter the inequalities inherent in both musical practices and the law.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton 
*00002382nab a22004694a 4500
*00111990
*00520201106111834.0
*007tu
*008180118s2017\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035  $a24704
*035  $a(PLib-conv)0000024704
*0410 $aeng
*090  $aOMA:SA-SLS
*1001 $aAguilar, Ananay.
*24510$aDistributed Ownership in Music :$bbetween authorship and performance /$cAnanay Aguilar.
*260  $c2017.
*300  $a1-23.
*4901 $aSocial & Legal Studies,$x1461-7390
*520  $aFollowing criticisms of British copyright law that it is influenced by Romantic ideals of authorship, I ask whether it makes sense to distinguish between music composers and performers in law. Drawing on interviews with classical and popular music performers and relevant case law, I examine how performers negotiate and exploit different rights in order to determine ownership. Evidence suggests that rather than a binary, musicians’ creative work can best be represented as moving along a continuum between composition and performance with both concepts socially much in use. Musicians position their work on this continuum according to three motifs: composer-performer discourses and careers, genre and power relationships. I argue that the legal categories of joint or individual authorship, adaptation and performance protect most contributions to a musical work and align with the social understandings of different types of contributions. Yet I also note that, viewed more normatively, a recasting of the rights could help shift those social understandings and alter the inequalities inherent in both musical practices and the law.
*599  $bpdf informaatikolta.
*653  $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653  $aTEKIJYYS
*653  $aMUSIIKKI
*653  $aMUSIIKKIALA
*653  $aOMISTAJUUS
*653  $aOIKEUDENHALTIJAT
*653  $aESITTÄMINEN
*653  $aESITTÄVÄ TAITEILIJA
*653  $aOIKEUDET
*653  $aÄÄNITTEET
*653  $aADAPTATION
*653  $aCOPYRIGHT
*653  $aJOINT AUTHORSHIP
*653  $aMUSIC
*653  $aOWNERSHIP
*653  $aPERFORMANCE
*653  $aPERFORMERS’  RIGHTS
*653  $aROMANTIC IDEALS
*653  $aSOUND RECORDING
*653  $aYHTEISTEOKSET
*8102 $aSocial & Legal Studies,$x1461-7390
*852  $hSA-SLS$cAGUILAR
*979  $a0000024704
*999  $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä