Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto : The art we wear

Hylly	MAYS SA-JO30
Henkilönnimi	Mays, Jóna N.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö	The art we wear
Julkaistu	2019.
Ulkoasutiedot	300-312.
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa	The Journal of World Intellectual Property, ISSN 1422-2213 ; 22 (5-6)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.	Since humans began wearing clothes, we have used them to portray characteristics about ourselves including ethnic origin, tribes, wealth, status, and religion. This paper discusses the intellectual property protection available for clothing designs in the United States, Europe, India, and China. It begins by discussing the history of fashion and fashion designing across the world during different eras. Next, the paper explains the early methods used to protect fashion designs as originators struggled to protect their creations in regimes that had not yet implemented sui generis protection for fashion designs. Some regimes, notably the United States, still do not offer sui generis protection for fashion designs and have greatly limited the industry's ability to self-regulate against copying. The paper also discusses and compares the current regime of fashion design protection in the United States, European Union, India, and China, including their strengths and deficiencies. Finally, the paper suggests a solution to the lack of protection in the United States that would treat fashion design piracy similarly to the treatment of counterfeit goods.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton	VAATTEET VAATETEOLLISUUS VAATESUUNNITTELU TEKIJÄNOIKEUS DESIGN RIGHTS DESIGN MUOTI IMMATERIAALIOIKEUS TAVARAMERKIT TRIPS

*00002137nab a22003614a 4500
*00114051
*00520201106111846.0
*007tu
*008191205s2019\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035  $a26819
*035  $a(PLib-conv)0000026819
*0410 $aeng
*090  $aOMA:SA-JO30
*1001 $aMays, Jóna N.
*24510$aThe art we wear /$cJóna N. Mays.
*260  $c2019.
*300  $a300-312.
*4901 $aThe Journal of World Intellectual Property,$x1422-2213 ;$v22 (5-6)
*520  $aSince humans began wearing clothes, we have used them to portray characteristics about ourselves including ethnic origin, tribes, wealth, status, and religion. This paper discusses the intellectual property protection available for clothing designs in the United States, Europe, India, and China. It begins by discussing the history of fashion and fashion designing across the world during different eras. Next, the paper explains the early methods used to protect fashion designs as originators struggled to protect their creations in regimes that had not yet implemented sui generis protection for fashion designs. Some regimes, notably the United States, still do not offer sui generis protection for fashion designs and have greatly limited the industry's ability to self-regulate against copying. The paper also discusses and compares the current regime of fashion design protection in the United States, European Union, India, and China, including their strengths and deficiencies. Finally, the paper suggests a solution to the lack of protection in the United States that would treat fashion design piracy similarly to the treatment of counterfeit goods.
*599  $bPDF informaatikolla.
*653  $aVAATTEET
*653  $aVAATETEOLLISUUS
*653  $aVAATESUUNNITTELU
*653  $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653  $aDESIGN RIGHTS
*653  $aDESIGN
*653  $aMUOTI
*653  $aIMMATERIAALIOIKEUS
*653  $aTAVARAMERKIT
*653  $aTRIPS
*8102 $aThe Journal of World Intellectual Property,$x1422-2213 ;$v22 (5-6)
*852  $hSA-JO30$cMAYS
*979  $a0000026819
*999  $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^

Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.