Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

*00009108nam a22002654a 4500
*00114446
*00520201106111848.0
*008200806s2020\\\\xx\||||||||||\||||||eng|c
*020  $a978-1-107-04331-2
*035  $a27222
*035  $a(PLib-conv)0000027222
*0410 $aeng
*084  $a33.34$2ykl
*1001 $aHudson, Emily.
*24510$aDrafting copyright exceptions :$bfrom the law in books to the law in action /$cEmily Hudson.
*260  $aCambridge :$bCambridge University Press,$c2020.
*300  $a380 s.
*4901 $aCambridge intellectual property and information law
*520  $aTable of Cases Australia Collier Constructions v. Foskett (1990) 19 IPR 44, 42 CBS Records Australia Ltd v. Telmak Teleproducts (Aust) Pty Ltd (1987) 9 IPR 440, 279 De Garis v. Neville Jeffress Pidler (1990) 18 IPR 292, 28, 233-234, 237, 240, 241, 247, 288, 289 National Rugby League Investments Pty Limited v. Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 59, 46-48 TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v. Network Ten Pty Ltd (2001) 108 FCR 235; (2002) 118 FCR 417, 28, 234, 289 Telstra Corporation Pty Ltd v. Premier Media Group Pty Ltd (2007) 72 IPR 89, 234, 289 University of New South Wales v. Moorhouse (1975) 133 CLR 1, 70  Canada Alberta (Education) v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright) [2012] 2 SCR 345, 268, 271-273, 303, 305 Bishop v. Stevens (1990) 72 DLR (4th) 97, 320, 322 BMG Canada Inc v. John Doe [2004] 3 FC 241, 242 Breen v. Hancock House Publishers Ltd (1985) 6 CPR (3d) 433, 320 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v. SODRAC 2003 Inc. [2015] 3 SCR 615, 320 Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency v. York University [2018] 2 FCR 43, 6, 69, 173, 266, 275, 301-306 Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada [2008] 3 FCR 539, 242-243 CCH Canadian Ltd v. Law Society of Upper Canada [2000] 2 FC 451; [2002] 4 FC 213; [2004] 1 SCR 339, 4-6, 8, 26, 70, 127-128, 151, 173, 230-262, 265-268, 273-275, 288, 294, 298, 303, 305, 307, 312, 317, 320-323, 325, 340  Cie Générale des Etablissements Michelin-Michelin & Cie v. CAWCanada (1996) 71 CPR (3d) 348, 321-322 Edutile Inc v. Automobile Protection Assn (1997) 81 CPR (3d) 338, 237 Entertainment Software Association v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada [2012] 2 SCR 231, 268 Euro Excellence Inc v. Kraft Canada Inc [2004] 4 FCR 410; [2006] 3 FCR 91; [2007] 3 SCR 20, 243-245, 252, 325 Hager v. ECW Press Ltd [1999] 2 FCR 287, 321 The Queen v. James Lorimer and Co Ltd [1984] 1 FC 1065, 320 Re:Sound v. Motion Picture Theatre Associations of Canada [2012] 2 SCR 376, 268 Robertson v. Thomson Corporation [2006] 2 SCR 363, 242-243 Rogers Communications Inc v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada [2012] 2 SCR 283, 268 Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Bell Canada [2012] 2 SCR 326, 268 Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Canadian Association of Internet Providers [2002] FCA 166; [2004] 2 SCR 427, 242, 243, 246 Statement of Royalties to be Collected by SOCAN for the Communication to the Public by Telecommunication, in Canada, of Musical or Dramatico-Musical Works, Tariff No 22A (Internet - Online Music Services) 1996-2006, Copyright Board of Canada, 18 October 2007, 243, 246-248, 325 Tele-Direct (Publications) Inc v. American Business Information Inc [1998] 2 FC 22, 237 Théberge v. Galerie d’Art du Petit Champlain [2002] 2 SCR 336, 239, 244, 245 Zamacois v. Douville and Marchand (1943) 2 CPR 270, 319  European Union Davidoff & Cie SA v. Gofkid Ltd (C-292/00) [2003] 1 WLR 1714, 311 Deckmyn v. Vandersteen (C-201/13) [2014] ECDR 21, 22, 23, 290-292 DR and TV2 Danmark A/S v. NCB - deNordisk Copyright Bureau (C-510/10) [2012] ECDR 20, 22 Funke Medien NRW GmbH v. Germany (C-469/17) [2019] ECDR 1; [2019] All ER (D) 48 (Aug), 21, 22, 23, 278 Painer v. Standard Verlags GmbH (C-145/10) [2012] ECDR 6, 18, 22, 72, 146, 278 Pelham GmbH v. Hütter (C-476/17) [2019] ECDR 3; [2019] Bus LR 2159, 20, 21, 22, 146, 278-280, 291, 292 Soulier v. Premier Ministre (C-301/15) [2017] ECDR 23, 101 Spiegel Online GMBH v. Volker Beck (C-516/17) [2019] Bus LR 2787, 21, 22, 23, 278, 284 Technische Universität Darmstadt v. Eugen Ulmer KG (C-117/13) [2014] ECDR 23, 18, 122, 152-153  New Zealand Longman Group Ltd v. Carrington Technical Institute Board of Governors [1991] 2 NZLR 574, 237   United Kingdom Antiquesportfolio.com v. Rodney Fitch & Co [2001] FSR 34, 72 Ashdown v. Telegraph Group [2002] Ch 149, 42 British Oxygen v. Liquid Air [1925] 1 Ch 383, 309 CBS Songs Ltd v. Amstrad Consumer Electronics Plc [1988] AC 1013, 48 Designers Guild Ltd v. Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 241, 52 England and Wales Cricket Board v. Tixdaq [2016] EWHC 575 (Ch) 23, 292 Fisher v. Brooker [2009] UKHL 41, 76 Hawkes and Sons v. Paramount Film Service [1934] 1 Ch 593, 309 HRH Prince of Wales v. Associated Newspapers Ltd [2006] EWHC 522 (Ch), 283 Hyperion Records Limited v. Sawkins [2005] EWCA Civ 565, 72 L’Oréal SA v. Bellure NV [2010] EWCA Civ 535, 24 Lion Laboratories v. Evans [1985] QB 526, 42 Norowzian v. Arks (No. 1) [1998] FSR 394, 279 Norowzian v. Arks (No. 2) [2000] FSR 363, 279 Performing Right Society Ltd v. Hammond’s Bradford Brewery Co Ltd [1934] Ch 121, 320 Pro Sieben Media AG v. Carlton UK Television Ltd [1999] FSR 610, 242 Reject Shop v. Manners [1995] FSR 870, 72 Sillitoe v. McGraw-Hill Book Company (UK) Ltd [1983] FSR 545 (Ch), 234, 237, 240, 247, 288-289 Temple Island Collections Ltd v. New English Teas Ltd [2012] EWPCC 1, 72 University of London Press v. University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601, 247, 309   United States A&M Records Inc v. Napster, Inc, 239 F 3d 1004 (9th circuit, 2001), 165, 166 American Geophysical Union v. Texaco Inc, 802 F Supp 1 (SDNY, 1992); 60 F 3d 913 (2nd circuit, 1993), 126, 164, 172, 199 Authors Guild, Inc v. Google Inc, 770 F Supp 2d 666 (SDNY, 2011); 954 F Supp 2d 282 (SDNY, 2013); 804 F 3d 202 (2nd circuit, 2015), 66, 192 Authors Guild, Inc v. HathiTrust, 902 F Supp 2d 445 (SDNY, 2012); 755 F 3d 87 (2nd circuit, 2014), 158, 161, 168, 192–194, 329 Basic Books Inc v. Kinko’s Graphics Corporation, 758 F Supp 1522 (SDNY, 1991), 173, 196, 198 Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley Limited, 386 F Supp 2d 324 (SDNY, 2005); 448 F 3d 605 (2nd circuit, 2006), 45, 164-167, 170, 172, 174, 176, 186, 192, 193, 260 Blanch v. Koons, 467 F 3d 244 (2nd circuit, 2006), 168, 170 Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp, 25 F Supp 2d 421 (SDNY, 1998); 36 F Supp 2d 191 (SDNY, 1999), 72, 176 Cambridge University Press v. Albert, 906 F 3d 1290 (11th circuit, 2018), 161, 329, 204-205 Cambridge University Press v. Becker, 863 F Supp 2d 1190 (ND Georgia, 2012); 2016 WL 3098397 (ND Georgia, 31 March 2016), 150, 161, 197-200, 201, 202-204 Cambridge University Press v. Patton, 769 F 3d 1232 (11th circuit, 2014), 150, 161, 197, 200, 202, 203, 302 Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc, 510 US 569 (1994), 59, 166, 167, 168, 175, 176, 199, 200, 317 Cariou v. Prince, 784 F Supp 2d 337 (SDNY, 2011); 714 F 3d 694 (2nd circuit, 2013), 168-170 Castle Rock Entertainment, Inc v. Carol Publishing Group Inc, 150 F 3d 132 (2nd circuit, 1998), 167, 168 Field v. Google Inc, 412 F Supp 2d 1106 (D Nev, 2006), 176 Folsom v. Marsh, 9 F Cas 342 (CCD Mass, 1841), 167 Graham v. Prince, No. 15-CV-10160 (SDNY, 18 July 2017), 169-170 Harper & Row Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, 471 US 539 (1985), 59, 174 Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corporation, 77 F Supp 2d 1116 (CD Cal, 1999); 336 F 3d 811 (9th circuit, 2003), 164-167, 170, 172, 176, 186, 193, 260 Kienitz v. Sconnie Nation LLC, 766 F 3d 756 (7th circuit, 2014), 169 Mannion v. Coors Brewing Company, 377 F Supp 2d 444 (SDNY, 2005), 72 Marcus v. Rowley, 695 F 2d 1171 (9th circuit, 1983), 196 National Basketball Association v. Motorola Inc, 105 F 3d 841 (2nd circuit, 1997), 202 New York Times v. Tasini, 533 US 483 (2001), 176 Perfect 10 v. Amazon.com, 487 F 3d 701 (9th circuit, 2007), 164, 166, 167, 170, 172, 174, 176, 186, 260 Perfect 10 v. Google, 416 F Supp 2d 828 (CD Cal, 2006), 164, 260 Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, 99 F 3d 1381 (6th circuit, 1996), 172, 196, 198 Rogers v. Koons, 960 F 2d 301 (2nd circuit, 1992), 72 Salinger v. Random House Inc, 811 F 2d 90 (2nd circuit, 1987), 45 Sony Corp of America v. Universal City Studios Inc, 446 US 417 (1984), 59 Stewart v. Abend, 495 US 207 (1990), 317 Sundeman v. Seajay Society Inc, 142 F 3d 194 (4th circuit, 1998), 176 Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin Co, 268 F 3d 1257 (11th circuit, 2001), 176 TCA Television Corp v. McCollum, 839 F 3d 168 (2nd circuit, 2016), 169 Williams & Wilkins Company v. The United States, 172 USPQ 670 (Court of Claims, 1972); 487 F 2d 1345 (Court of Claims, 1973); 420 US 376 (1975), 115-116, 164
*653  $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653  $aPOIKKEUKSET
*653  $aOIKEUSTAPAUKSET
*653  $atekijänoikeuden rajoitukset ja poikkeukset
*8102 $aCambridge intellectual property and information law
*852  $i9723713$h33.34$cHUDSON
*979  $a0000027222
*999  $aMikroMarc$b[Book]$x0
^

How should copyright exceptions be drafted? This is a question of ongoing concern in scholarly and law reform debates. In Drafting Copyright Exceptions, Emily Hudson assesses drafting options using insights from the standards and rules literature, and case studies from cultural institutions in Australia, Canada, the UK and the US. Drawing on thousands of hours of fieldwork conducted over fourteen years, the book describes how staff engage with and interpret the law. Whilst some practices are guided strongly by copyright doctrine, others are influenced by the factors such as ethical views, risk assessment, and prosaic matters related to collection management. This work should be read by anyone interested in a detailed account of interpretative practices related to the drafting of copyright exceptions, but it also speaks to broader debates about the relationship between the 'law in books' and the 'law in action'.