Hylly SA- The Journal of World Intellectual Property
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Economic development dimension of intellectual property as investment in international investment law
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa The Journal of World Intellectual Property, ISSN 1422-2213 ; 23(5-6)
Huomautus sisällöstä Intellectual property (IP) and foreign direct investment (FDI) are seen as important contributors to economic development . However, once given a closer look, a complex economic landscape emerges. Although, both IP and FDI can be beneficial to the economic development of a country their presence does not automatically guarantee it. From a legal perspective, the treaties governing the two international legal regimes, international IP law and international investment law (IIL), reflect the positive development al aspirations ascribed to IP and FDI. Nevertheless, once these international treaties are put to the test in international adjudication, economic development becomes a contested notion. In particular, investor‐state dispute settlement (ISDS) tribunals are often confronted with economic development as a legal concept and the way they treat it can vastly differ. By relying on the Salini test in ISDS cases dealing with IP, the Tribunals had the chance to address the development al dimension of IP as FDI. Philip Morris v. Uruguay and Bridgestone v. Panama give a detailed outlook on the different outcomes such considerations might result in. Focusing on those cases this article will argue that economic development deserves a place in the realm of IP and IIL.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12171 Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000 ab a ar
*00115075
*008 s2020||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*041 $aeng
*1001 $aStepanov, Ivan.
*24510$aEconomic development dimension of intellectual property as investment in international investment law /$cIvan Stepanov
*260 $c2020
*300 $as. 736-758.
*490 $aThe Journal of World Intellectual Property,$x1422-2213 ;$v23(5-6)
*505 $aIntellectual property (IP) and foreign direct investment (FDI) are seen as important contributors to economic development . However, once given a closer look, a complex economic landscape emerges. Although, both IP and FDI can be beneficial to the economic development of a country their presence does not automatically guarantee it. From a legal perspective, the treaties governing the two international legal regimes, international IP law and international investment law (IIL), reflect the positive development al aspirations ascribed to IP and FDI. Nevertheless, once these international treaties are put to the test in international adjudication, economic development becomes a contested notion. In particular, investor‐state dispute settlement (ISDS) tribunals are often confronted with economic development as a legal concept and the way they treat it can vastly differ. By relying on the Salini test in ISDS cases dealing with IP, the Tribunals had the chance to address the development al dimension of IP as FDI. Philip Morris v. Uruguay and Bridgestone v. Panama give a detailed outlook on the different outcomes such considerations might result in. Focusing on those cases this article will argue that economic development deserves a place in the realm of IP and IIL.
*653 $aeconomic development
*653 $aforeign direct investment
*653 $aISDS
*653 $akey topics
*653 $aorganizations and agreements
*653 $aTRIPS
*852 $hSA- The Journal of World Intellectual Property
*85640$uhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12171$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.