Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

Are works of artificial intelligence in need for further protection?
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-EIPR
Henkilönnimi
  • Legner, Sarah.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Are works of artificial intelligence in need for further protection?
Julkaistu
  • 2021
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 71-73.
  • (pdf)
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • European Intellectual Property Review, ISSN 0142-0461 ; 43(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Owing to technological advancement, artificial intelligence can create works of art and literature which easily meet the threshold of creativity that copyright laws demand for protection. Traditionally, however, copyright legislation, notably in continental Europe, focuses on work created and conveyed by the human spirit. The missing protection of machined-authored work has led to the question of whether the legal framework still meets the spirit of the time or rather needs to be adjusted to face the spread of creative artificial intelligence. This opinion considers whether free access to machine-made work should be constrained.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • European Intellectual Property Review, 0142-0461 ; 43(2)
*000      ab a        ar
*00115094
*008      s2021||||fi |||||||||||||||||eng||            
*041  $aeng
*1001 $aLegner, Sarah.
*24510$aAre works of artificial intelligence in need for further protection? /$cSarah Legner
*260  $c2021
*300  $as. 71-73.
*300  $a(pdf)
*4901 $aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v43(2)
*520  $aOwing to technological advancement, artificial intelligence can create works of art and literature which easily meet the threshold of creativity that copyright laws demand for protection. Traditionally, however, copyright legislation, notably in continental Europe, focuses on work created and conveyed by the human spirit. The missing protection of machined-authored work has led to the question of whether the legal framework still meets the spirit of the time or rather needs to be adjusted to face the spread of creative artificial intelligence. This opinion considers whether free access to machine-made work should be constrained.
*650 7$atekoäly$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2616
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atietokonetaide$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11956$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijyys$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14774$2yso/fin
*653  $amoraaliset oikeudet
*653  $atekijänoikeudellinen suoja 
*830 0$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v43(2)
*852  $hSA-EIPR
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
Ex1Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoKirjasto SA-EIPR