Hylly SA-International Journal of Heritage Studies
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Situating (in)significance
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa International Journal of Heritage Studies ISSN 1470-3610 26(9)
Huomautus sisällöstä In this paper we introduce the concept of ‘(in)significance’ as a way to think about values in heritage, and in the attribution, recording, description, assessment and categorisation practices that characterise heritage processes. Our aim is to throw light on how this concept shapes, and is shaped by, contemporary heritage practices and outcomes. We consider the history of the idea of significance, particularly as it is defined in the Burra Charter, and trace its inheritance lines in settler nation states and capitalist economic structures, and highlight its retention of concepts of heritage value as both intrinsic and culturally attributed. Using international, mainly Anglophone examples, we review a range of case studies and examples of significance and insignificance, of significance assessment in practice, and the tensions between expert, institutional or ‘official’ values and broader concepts of heritage and attachment. We suggest that the dual or layered concept of ‘(in)significance’ might allow for heritage practices that interact with emotions, memory, place and things in ways that are often not possible in the context of official heritage regimes because of rigid aesthetic and conservation paradigms, as well as identity and ownership claims and deeply invested national narratives.
Asiasana
Henkilönnimi Brown, Steve. Schofield, John.
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13527258.2020.1755882?needAccess=true Open access
*000 ab a ar
*00115127
*008 s2020||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*041 $aeng
*1001 $aIreland, Tracy.
*24510$aSituating (in)significance /$cTracy Ireland , Steve Brown & John Schofield
*260 $c2020
*300 $as. 826-844.
*300 $a(pdf)
*490 $aInternational Journal of Heritage Studies$x1470-3610$v26(9)
*505 $aIn this paper we introduce the concept of ‘(in)significance’ as a way to think about values in heritage, and in the attribution, recording, description, assessment and categorisation practices that characterise heritage processes. Our aim is to throw light on how this concept shapes, and is shaped by, contemporary heritage practices and outcomes. We consider the history of the idea of significance, particularly as it is defined in the Burra Charter, and trace its inheritance lines in settler nation states and capitalist economic structures, and highlight its retention of concepts of heritage value as both intrinsic and culturally attributed. Using international, mainly Anglophone examples, we review a range of case studies and examples of significance and insignificance, of significance assessment in practice, and the tensions between expert, institutional or ‘official’ values and broader concepts of heritage and attachment. We suggest that the dual or layered concept of ‘(in)significance’ might allow for heritage practices that interact with emotions, memory, place and things in ways that are often not possible in the context of official heritage regimes because of rigid aesthetic and conservation paradigms, as well as identity and ownership claims and deeply invested national narratives.
*650 $amerkitys (tärkeys)$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7010$2yso/fin
*650 $aarvo$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1007$2yso/fin
*650 $akulttuuriperintö$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8475$2yso/fin
*7001 $aBrown, Steve.
*700 $aSchofield, John.
*852 $hSA-International Journal of Heritage Studies
*85640$uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13527258.2020.1755882?needAccess=true$yOpen access
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.