Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

The Role of National and International Intellectual Property Law and Policy in Reconceptualising the Definition of Investment
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-IIC
Henkilönnimi
  • Upreti, Pratyush Nath.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • The Role of National and International Intellectual Property Law and Policy in Reconceptualising the Definition of Investment
Julkaistu
  • 2021
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 103 - 136.
  • PDF
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 52(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä
  • This article analyses the role of national and international intellectual property (IP) law in assessing IP as a protected investment. It offers two approaches for controlling investment arbitration related to intellectual property rights (IPRs), followed by an examination of the implications and challenges of those approaches. Its main argument is that even if a dispute arises from an investment (IP as an investment), it does not necessarily fall under the jurisdictional requirements of investment arbitration. Rather, assessing IP as an investment must be done by referring to national laws. This is more relevant in the case of IPRs as they are territorial. This means that rights and obligations are derived from national IP legislation. Essentially, only those IPRs that are “protected” by national regimes should be treated as investments. This article also examines the language used in investment agreements and arbitral awards to analyse the role of national law, particularly in determining the validity and scope of IP investments. Then it examines three IP-related arbitral cases to discuss how arbitral tribunals have used national law. Finally, it suggests approaches for controlling investment arbitration by integrating the territoriality principle and the social objectives and bargains achieved through international IP treaties.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 52(2)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40319-020-01009-7.pdf Open access
*000      ab a        ar
*00115195
*008      s2021||||fi |||||||||||||||||eng||            
*041  $aeng
*1001 $aUpreti, Pratyush Nath.
*24510$aThe Role of National and International Intellectual Property Law and Policy in Reconceptualising the Definition of Investment /$cPratyush Nath Upreti
*260  $c2021
*300  $as. 103 - 136.
*300  $aPDF
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v52(2)
*505  $aThis article analyses the role of national and international intellectual property (IP) law in assessing IP as a protected investment. It offers two approaches for controlling investment arbitration related to intellectual property rights (IPRs), followed by an examination of the implications and challenges of those approaches. Its main argument is that even if a dispute arises from an investment (IP as an investment), it does not necessarily fall under the jurisdictional requirements of investment arbitration. Rather, assessing IP as an investment must be done by referring to national laws. This is more relevant in the case of IPRs as they are territorial. This means that rights and obligations are derived from national IP legislation. Essentially, only those IPRs that are “protected” by national regimes should be treated as investments. This article also examines the language used in investment agreements and arbitral awards to analyse the role of national law, particularly in determining the validity and scope of IP investments. Then it examines three IP-related arbitral cases to discuss how arbitral tribunals have used national law. Finally, it suggests approaches for controlling investment arbitration by integrating the territoriality principle and the social objectives and bargains achieved through international IP treaties.
*650  $atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*653  $aISDS
*653  $aTRIPS
*653  $aICSID
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v52(2)
*852  $hSA-IIC
*85640$uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40319-020-01009-7.pdf$yOpen access
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Teos 
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
Ex1Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoKirjasto SA-IIC