Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

Copyright and Digital Teaching Exceptions in the EU : Legislative Developments and Implementation Models of Art. 5 CDSM Directive
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-IIC
Henkilönnimi
  • Priora, Giulia, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Copyright and Digital Teaching Exceptions in the EU : Legislative Developments and Implementation Models of Art. 5 CDSM Directive
Julkaistu
  • Springer, 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 543–566.
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 53(4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Article 5 of the 2019 EU Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (CDSM) attempted to modernize the regime of copyright exceptions and limitations related to teaching activities. Its aim is to enhance the flexibility behind permitted uses to the benefit of educational institutions regarding their digital and cross-border teaching. The pressing need for such a legislative reform was confirmed by the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which dramatically moved teaching environments to online platforms. This paper dissects Art. 5 CDSM Directive unveiling three layers of analysis. First, the substance, logic, and promises of the new provision are introduced. Second, it identifies diverging national implementation models, developing a comparative study of the Hungarian, German, and Italian experiences. Third, drawing from the comparative study, the paper provides fundamental guidance in understanding whether Art. 5 CDSM Directive can be considered an evolution or, rather, a devolution of the copyright teaching exceptions in Europe. Focusing on the systematic concerns arising from the new provision, its embedded limits, and the strategic uses of the licensing carve-out, we conclude that the EU legislature has only partially achieved the goal of striking a more European, modern, and sustainable balance between copyright protection and the right to education in the digital environment.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Henkilönnimi
  • Jütte, Bernd Justin, kirjoittaja.
  • Mezei, Péter, kirjoittaja.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 53(4)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01179-6 Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000      ab a        ar
*00117054
*008      s2022||||sz |||||||||||||||||eng||            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aPriora, Giulia,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aCopyright and Digital Teaching Exceptions in the EU :$bLegislative Developments and Implementation Models of Art. 5 CDSM Directive /$cGiulia Priora, Bernd Justin Jütte, Péter Mezei.
*264 1$bSpringer,$c2022.
*300  $as. 543–566.
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v53(4)
*520  $aArticle 5 of the 2019 EU Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (CDSM) attempted to modernize the regime of copyright exceptions and limitations related to teaching activities. Its aim is to enhance the flexibility behind permitted uses to the benefit of educational institutions regarding their digital and cross-border teaching. The pressing need for such a legislative reform was confirmed by the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which dramatically moved teaching environments to online platforms. This paper dissects Art. 5 CDSM Directive unveiling three layers of analysis. First, the substance, logic, and promises of the new provision are introduced. Second, it identifies diverging national implementation models, developing a comparative study of the Hungarian, German, and Italian experiences. Third, drawing from the comparative study, the paper provides fundamental guidance in understanding whether Art. 5 CDSM Directive can be considered an evolution or, rather, a devolution of the copyright teaching exceptions in Europe. Focusing on the systematic concerns arising from the new provision, its embedded limits, and the strategic uses of the licensing carve-out, we conclude that the EU legislature has only partially achieved the goal of striking a more European, modern, and sustainable balance between copyright protection and the right to education in the digital environment.
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-direktiivit$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10768$2yso/fin
*650 7$akoulutus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p84$2yso/fin
*650 7$adigitaalinen oppimateriaali$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3597
*653  $aDSM-direktiivi
*653  $aArtikla 5
*653  $across-border
*7001 $aJütte, Bernd Justin,$ekirjoittaja.
*7001 $aMezei, Péter,$ekirjoittaja.
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v53(4)
*852  $hSA-IIC
*85641$uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01179-6$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
Ex1Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoKirjasto SA-IIC