Hylly
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Supreme Court (the Third Petty Bench) 21 July 2020– 2018 (Ju) 1412 : The Infringement of the Right of Attribution by ‘Retweet’ – Photograph Retweet (case note by Tatsuhiro Ueno)
Julkaistu Verlag C.H. Beck, München : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa GRUR International, ISSN 2632-8623 ; 71(1)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. 1. The process wherein ‘the work is made available or presented to the public’ as referred to in Art. 19, para. (1) of the Copyright Act is not required to be carried out through the exploitation of the work regarding which any of the rights prescribed in Arts. 21 to 27 of the same Act exist. 2. Where a person made a post, via an information network on the internet, with an image of a photograph, which is another person’s work, and this image was displayed, with its part containing the indication of the author's name having been trimmed off, on the terminals of the viewers of the webpage of that post, the person who made the post cannot be deemed to have indicated the author's name, even if the viewers could have viewed the original image accompanied by the indication of the author’s name, under the following circumstances (a) and (b) described in the judgment
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke GRUR International, 2632-8623 ; 71(1)
*000 ab a ar
*00117116
*008 s2022||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*24500$aSupreme Court (the Third Petty Bench) 21 July 2020– 2018 (Ju) 1412 :$bThe Infringement of the Right of Attribution by ‘Retweet’ – Photograph Retweet (case note by Tatsuhiro Ueno) /$bCopyright Act, Art. 19; Act on the Limitation of Liability for Damages of Specified Telecommunications Service Providers, Art. 4.1.
*264 1$aMünchen :$bVerlag C.H. Beck,$c2022.
*300 $as. 60-63
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v71(1)
*520 $a1. The process wherein ‘the work is made available or presented to the public’ as referred to in Art. 19, para. (1) of the Copyright Act is not required to be carried out through the exploitation of the work regarding which any of the rights prescribed in Arts. 21 to 27 of the same Act exist. 2. Where a person made a post, via an information network on the internet, with an image of a photograph, which is another person’s work, and this image was displayed, with its part containing the indication of the author's name having been trimmed off, on the terminals of the viewers of the webpage of that post, the person who made the post cannot be deemed to have indicated the author's name, even if the viewers could have viewed the original image accompanied by the indication of the author’s name, under the following circumstances (a) and (b) described in the judgment
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$aInternet$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20405$2yso/fin
*650 7$akuvatallenteet $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5962$2yso/fin
*650 7$asosiaalinen media$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20774$2yso/fin
*653 $aJapani
*830 0$aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v71(1)
*852 $hSA-GRUR International
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.