Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

A Topography of Data Commons : From Regulation to Private Dynamism
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-GRUR International
Henkilönnimi
  • Ottolia, Andrea, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • A Topography of Data Commons : From Regulation to Private Dynamism
Julkaistu
  • Verlag C.H. Beck, München : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 335–345
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • GRUR International, ISSN 2632-8623 ; 71(4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Knowledge is subject to enclosure through digital technology and legal rules. Data collected, stored and pooled by the Internet of Things (IoT) or Artificial Intelligence (AI) are no exception to this. Operators acting in the markets related to the algorithmic society may have a quite diversified range of intellectual property rights (IPRs) to protect the information they produce and manage. This is exploited through algorithmic processing techniques, aggregating collected data for the generation of new ones, thus creating additional information and knowledge. This paper studies whether and when data, information and knowledge, presented within the Big Data, IoT and AI structures, may be considered and exploited as commons. The analysis is not aimed at stating that commons should be the general solution for the algorithmic society. Nor does it endorse legal interpretations unilaterally favoring openness and limiting IPR protection and privacy rules (though this could be the case under certain circumstances). The question is to establish whether a certain level of commons should be provided by regulation or left to spontaneous private initiatives. In this regard, two different meanings of data commons are used in this work. The first one refers to the open access systems provided by regulation, equivalent to a public domain protection, and opposed to exclusivity mechanisms. The second refers to data commons which are privately ‘constructed’ on top of background regulation and manage resources for a limited set of claimants.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Henkilönnimi
  • Sappa, Cristiana, kirjoittaja.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • GRUR International, 2632-8623 ; 71(4)
*000      ab a        ar
*00117143
*008      s2022||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aOttolia, Andrea,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aA Topography of Data Commons :$bFrom Regulation to Private Dynamism /$cAndrea Ottolia, Cristiana Sappa.
*264 1$aMünchen :$bVerlag C.H. Beck,$c2022.
*300  $as. 335–345
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v71(4)
*520  $aKnowledge is subject to enclosure through digital technology and legal rules. Data collected, stored and pooled by the Internet of Things (IoT) or Artificial Intelligence (AI) are no exception to this. Operators acting in the markets related to the algorithmic society may have a quite diversified range of intellectual property rights (IPRs) to protect the information they produce and manage. This is exploited through algorithmic processing techniques, aggregating collected data for the generation of new ones, thus creating additional information and knowledge. This paper studies whether and when data, information and knowledge, presented within the Big Data, IoT and AI structures, may be considered and exploited as commons. The analysis is not aimed at stating that commons should be the general solution for the algorithmic society. Nor does it endorse legal interpretations unilaterally favoring openness and limiting IPR protection and privacy rules (though this could be the case under certain circumstances). The question is to establish whether a certain level of commons should be provided by regulation or left to spontaneous private initiatives. In this regard, two different meanings of data commons are used in this work. The first one refers to the open access systems provided by regulation, equivalent to a public domain protection, and opposed to exclusivity mechanisms. The second refers to data commons which are privately ‘constructed’ on top of background regulation and manage resources for a limited set of claimants.
*650 7$adata$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27250$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekoäly$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2616
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$atietosuoja$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3636$2yso/fin
*653  $aIoT
*7001 $aSappa, Cristiana,$ekirjoittaja.
*830 0$aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v71(4)
*852  $hSA-GRUR International
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
Ex1Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoKirjasto SA-GRUR International