Hylly
Henkilönnimi Veljanovski, Cento, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Pricing Algorithms as Collusive Devices
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 53(4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. This article undertakes a critical review of the prospect that reinforced-learning, or more loosely described machine-based, pricing algorithms will lead to widespread collusion without human involvement. There is no evidence, no antitrust case, and no strong theoretical and practical reasons for this belief. Notwithstanding this dearth of evidence, legal commentators continue to insist that algorithmic collusion poses a significant threat and that there is a “gap” in antitrust laws that needs to be filled. However, a reasonable assessment suggests that EU antitrust law and its enforcement are adaptable enough to deal with the cases that may arise.
Asiasana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 53(4)
*000 ab a ar
*00117171
*008 s2022||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aVeljanovski, Cento,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aPricing Algorithms as Collusive Devices /$cCento Veljanovski.
*264 1$bSpringer,$c2022.
*300 $as. 604–622
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v53(4)
*520 $aThis article undertakes a critical review of the prospect that reinforced-learning, or more loosely described machine-based, pricing algorithms will lead to widespread collusion without human involvement. There is no evidence, no antitrust case, and no strong theoretical and practical reasons for this belief. Notwithstanding this dearth of evidence, legal commentators continue to insist that algorithmic collusion poses a significant threat and that there is a “gap” in antitrust laws that needs to be filled. However, a reasonable assessment suggests that EU antitrust law and its enforcement are adaptable enough to deal with the cases that may arise.
*650 7$aalgoritmit$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14524$2yso/fin
*650 7$alainsäädäntö$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13854
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*650 7$akoneoppiminen $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p21846$2yso/fin
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v53(4)
*852 $hSA-IIC
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.