Hylly SA-Entertainment Law Review
Henkilönnimi Gisbey, Ben, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö No Luv Lost : IPEC Rejects Passing-off Claims in Band-name Dispute
Julkaistu Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Entertainment Law Review, ISSN 0959-3799 ; 33(7)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. In the latest instalment of the "Luv Injection" band-name dispute, the IPEC has rejected passing-off and trade-mark claims. The goodwill in the band's name was a partnership asset. So the claimant, as only one former member of that partnership, could not bring a passing-off claim in his own name against another former member. The fact that the claimant was one of the front men was irrelevant, and did not change the legal position that the goodwill was owned by the original partnership as a whole and could not be "appropriated" by individual partners without a transfer of ownership.
Asiasana
Henkilönnimi Clark, Dionne, kirjoittaja.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Entertainment Law Review, 0959-3799 ; 33(7)
*000 ab a ar
*00117229
*008 s2022||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aGisbey, Ben,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aNo Luv Lost :$bIPEC Rejects Passing-off Claims in Band-name Dispute /$cBen Gisbey, Dionne Clark.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2022.
*300 $as. 243-246
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEntertainment Law Review,$x0959-3799 ;$v33(7)
*520 $aIn the latest instalment of the "Luv Injection" band-name dispute, the IPEC has rejected passing-off and trade-mark claims. The goodwill in the band's name was a partnership asset. So the claimant, as only one former member of that partnership, could not bring a passing-off claim in his own name against another former member. The fact that the claimant was one of the front men was irrelevant, and did not change the legal position that the goodwill was owned by the original partnership as a whole and could not be "appropriated" by individual partners without a transfer of ownership.
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$atavaramerkit$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1488
*650 7$ateollisoikeus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3067
*650 7$amusiikki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1808
*650 7$ayhtyeet $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5072
*7001 $aClark, Dionne,$ekirjoittaja.
*830 0$aEntertainment Law Review,$x0959-3799 ;$v33(7)
*852 $hSA-Entertainment Law Review
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.