Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

The Polish transposition of the press publishers’ right : waiting for the miracle?
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-JIPLP
Henkilönnimi
  • Kowala, Michalina, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • The Polish transposition of the press publishers’ right : waiting for the miracle?
Julkaistu
  • Oxford University Press, Oxford : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 429–436
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, ISSN 1747-1532 ; 17(5)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • The implementation process of the press publishers’ related right introduced in Article 15 of the CDSM Directive is either nearing completion or has already been completed in most Member States. The implementation of the right that entitles press publishers to control the use of their publications by information society service providers (ISSPs) and to negotiate the appropriate remuneration is mandatory. Poland is still at the initial stage of the implementation process. On 30 June 2020, the Ministry of Culture announced a public consultation on the transposition of the CDSM Directive, which ran until 30 September 2020. The Council of Ministers scheduled the draft bill to be approved by the end of 2021. Unfortunately, to this day, it has not been published. It is worth recalling that the CDSM Directive should have been implemented by 7 June 2021, and the first country to introduce the press publishers’ right was France, which amended its Intellectual Property Code with the law n° 2019–775 on 24 July 2019. These significant time gaps in the regulation of press publishers’ right may consequently contribute to disparities in the level of publisher protection from one Member State to another, as well as creating legal uncertainty. On a side note, it is worth noting that not all scholars praise the quality of the French implementation, so the question of whether the speed of the right’s adoption always implies a good outcome.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1747-1532 ; 17(5)
*000      ab a        ar
*00117410
*008      s2022||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aKowala, Michalina,$ekirjoittaja.
*24514$aThe Polish transposition of the press publishers’ right :$bwaiting for the miracle? /$cMichalina Kowala.
*264 1$aOxford :$bOxford University Press,$c2022.
*300  $as. 429–436
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v17(5)
*520  $aThe implementation process of the press publishers’ related right introduced in Article 15 of the CDSM Directive is either nearing completion or has already been completed in most Member States. The implementation of the right that entitles press publishers to control the use of their publications by information society service providers (ISSPs) and to negotiate the appropriate remuneration is mandatory. Poland is still at the initial stage of the implementation process. On 30 June 2020, the Ministry of Culture announced a public consultation on the transposition of the CDSM Directive, which ran until 30 September 2020. The Council of Ministers scheduled the draft bill to be approved by the end of 2021. Unfortunately, to this day, it has not been published. It is worth recalling that the CDSM Directive should have been implemented by 7 June 2021, and the first country to introduce the press publishers’ right was France, which amended its Intellectual Property Code with the law n° 2019–775 on 24 July 2019. These significant time gaps in the regulation of press publishers’ right may consequently contribute to disparities in the level of publisher protection from one Member State to another, as well as creating legal uncertainty. On a side note, it is worth noting that not all scholars praise the quality of the French implementation, so the question of whether the speed of the right’s adoption always implies a good outcome.
*650 7$ajulkaisutoiminta$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2700$2yso/fin
*650 7$alehdistö$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2422$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-direktiivit$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10768$2yso/fin
*650 7$alehtikustantajat$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16772
*651 7$aPuola$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105244$2yso/fin
*653  $aDSM-direktiivi
*653  $aArtikla 15
*653  $alehtikustantajan lähioikeus
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v17(5)
*852  $hSA-JIPLP
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
Ex1Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoKirjasto SA-JIPLP