Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö China’s intellectual property regime in light of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership
Julkaistu Oxford University Press, Oxford : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, ISSN 1747-1532 ; 17(9)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. On 16 September 2021, China announced its application to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP, the Agreement) of 30 December 2018, which suspended certain provisions of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (the original version of the Agreement). China’s application to join the CPTPP has prompted debates over the compatibility of China’s domestic legal system with the CPTPP’s high standards, especially as trade mark and copyright infringements are pervasive in China and IP law enforcement remains a challenge.1 Very few studies have compared the provisions of the CPTPP with the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC’s) IP regulations,2 and such studies fail to take into account the latest changes to the PRC’s laws. For example, these studies overlook to apply the systematic approach necessary to analyse the intensity of cross-class protection for unregistered, well-known trade marks, and they do not apply the necessary comparative approach to speculate on the duration of patent grace periods as restricted by the Agreement. This study addresses this gap in the literature.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1747-1532 ; 17(9)
*000 ab a ar
*00117497
*008 s2022||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aWang, Chao,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aChina’s intellectual property regime in light of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership /$cChao Wang.
*264 1$aOxford :$bOxford University Press,$c2022.
*300 $as. 775–786
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v17(9)
*520 $aOn 16 September 2021, China announced its application to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP, the Agreement) of 30 December 2018, which suspended certain provisions of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (the original version of the Agreement). China’s application to join the CPTPP has prompted debates over the compatibility of China’s domestic legal system with the CPTPP’s high standards, especially as trade mark and copyright infringements are pervasive in China and IP law enforcement remains a challenge.1 Very few studies have compared the provisions of the CPTPP with the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC’s) IP regulations,2 and such studies fail to take into account the latest changes to the PRC’s laws. For example, these studies overlook to apply the systematic approach necessary to analyse the intensity of cross-class protection for unregistered, well-known trade marks, and they do not apply the necessary comparative approach to speculate on the duration of patent grace periods as restricted by the Agreement. This study addresses this gap in the literature.
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atavaramerkit$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1488
*650 7$arikkomukset $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3699
*651 7$aKiina$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p104984$2yso/fin
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v17(9)
*852 $hSA-JIPLP
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.