Hylly
Henkilönnimi Izyumenko, Elena, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Europe’s Human Rights Court rules for the first time on a breach of a copyright holder’s right to property in a private dispute
Julkaistu Oxford University Press, Oxford : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, ISSN 1747-1532 ; 18(11)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. The European Court of Human Rights has recently ruled that the domestic courts’ failure to justify the grounds for dismissing the applicant’s copyright infringement claim in a private-party dispute concerning the unauthorized online reproduction of the applicant’s book breached the latter’s human right to property. Notably, the Court was not satisfied with the fact that the national courts had not persuasively explained their conclusions regarding the applicability in the applicant’s case of digital exhaustion and of copyright exceptions for libraries and private copying.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1747-1532 ; 18(11)
*000 ab a ar
*00117635
*008 s2022||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aIzyumenko, Elena,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aEurope’s Human Rights Court rules for the first time on a breach of a copyright holder’s right to property in a private dispute /$cElena Izyumenko.
*264 1$aOxford :$bOxford University Press,$c2022.
*300 $as. 896–898
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v18(11)
*520 $aThe European Court of Human Rights has recently ruled that the domestic courts’ failure to justify the grounds for dismissing the applicant’s copyright infringement claim in a private-party dispute concerning the unauthorized online reproduction of the applicant’s book breached the latter’s human right to property. Notably, the Court was not satisfied with the fact that the national courts had not persuasively explained their conclusions regarding the applicability in the applicant’s case of digital exhaustion and of copyright exceptions for libraries and private copying.
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$arikkomukset $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3699
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*650 7$aihmisoikeudet$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2402
*650 7$akopiointi$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2175
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUSRIKKOMUS
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v18(11)
*852 $hSA-JIPLP
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.