Hylly SA-Entertainment Law Review
Henkilönnimi Tall, Nicholas, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Paddington (Marma)Laid Bare : IPEC Unstick Audit Provision in Royalty Sharing Agreement
Julkaistu Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Entertainment Law Review, ISSN 0959-3799 ; 34(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. This article considers the judgment of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in Pixdene Ltd v Paddington and Company Ltd, in which HHJ Melissa Clarke applied principles of contractual interpretation and implication of terms to come to a decision on the meaning of a short-form audit provision in a royalty sharing agreement in respect of "Paddington Bear" merchandise. The very existence of the dispute, and the fact that each party won on certain points, hightlights the need to clearly draft such clauses. The well-reasoned decision should be a must-read for all lawyers drafting agreements including audit provisions.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Entertainment Law Review, 0959-3799 ; 34(2)
*000 ab a ar
*00117874
*008 s2023||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aTall, Nicholas, $ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aPaddington (Marma)Laid Bare :$bIPEC Unstick Audit Provision in Royalty Sharing Agreement /$cNicholas Tall.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2023.
*300 $as. 58-63
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEntertainment Law Review,$x0959-3799 ;$v34(2)
*520 $aThis article considers the judgment of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in Pixdene Ltd v Paddington and Company Ltd, in which HHJ Melissa Clarke applied principles of contractual interpretation and implication of terms to come to a decision on the meaning of a short-form audit provision in a royalty sharing agreement in respect of "Paddington Bear" merchandise. The very existence of the dispute, and the fact that each party won on certain points, hightlights the need to clearly draft such clauses. The well-reasoned decision should be a must-read for all lawyers drafting agreements including audit provisions.
*650 7$arojaltit$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16798
*650 7$asopimusoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20249$2yso/fin
*650 7$aoheistuotteet $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p26723$2yso/fin
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*651 7$aIso-Britannia$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p104990
*830 0$aEntertainment Law Review,$x0959-3799 ;$v34(2)
*852 $hSA-Entertainment Law Review
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.