Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Permanent Injunction on Intellectual Property Rights : Judicial Experiences in China
Julkaistu Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa European Intellectual Property Review, ISSN 0142-0461 ; 45(3)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. In China, permanent injunction is categorised as one type of civil liability, different from preliminary injunction as procedure institution. Once determined to constitute an infringement of intellectual property rights, the Chinese court supports in principle the request for a permanent injunction by the right holder. In recent years, judicial policy and judicial practice have broken the inherent model, but the restriction of the application of permanent injunction is still an exception. Based on the Chinese courts' judgments of the past 10 years, this article analyses the application conditions of the permanent injunction, the reasons for the restrictions of the application, and its alternative measures.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke European Intellectual Property Review, 0142-0461 ; 45(3)
*000 ab a ar
*00117897
*008 s2023||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aYu, Ling,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aPermanent Injunction on Intellectual Property Rights :$bJudicial Experiences in China /$cLing Yu.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2023.
*300 $as. 154-160
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v45(3)
*520 $aIn China, permanent injunction is categorised as one type of civil liability, different from preliminary injunction as procedure institution. Once determined to constitute an infringement of intellectual property rights, the Chinese court supports in principle the request for a permanent injunction by the right holder. In recent years, judicial policy and judicial practice have broken the inherent model, but the restriction of the application of permanent injunction is still an exception. Based on the Chinese courts' judgments of the past 10 years, this article analyses the application conditions of the permanent injunction, the reasons for the restrictions of the application, and its alternative measures.
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$alainsäädäntö$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13854
*650 7$avelvoitteet $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24519
*651 7$aKiina$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p104984$2yso/fin
*830 0$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v45(3)
*852 $hSA-EIPR
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.