Hylly
Henkilönnimi Rózenfeldová, Laura Bachňáková, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Prosecution of copyright infringements as a criminal offence in Slovakia
Julkaistu Oxford University Press, Oxford : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, ISSN 1747-1532 ; 17(12)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Criminal enforcement of IP rights (IPRs) is a highly discussed and contentious issue. The underlying reasons for differing views in this regard relate to the justifications of sanctioning IPR infringements through criminal law instruments. Criminal law, although helpful in some cases of IPR infringements, where certain public interests are at stake (eg counterfeiting goods endangering public health), can be (ab)used by private parties to enforce their rights through state prosecution rather than civil litigation that may be too costly, lengthy or have unsatisfactory outcomes.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1747-1532 ; 17(12).
*000 ab a ar
*00118881
*008 s2022||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aRózenfeldová, Laura Bachňáková,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aProsecution of copyright infringements as a criminal offence in Slovakia /$cLaura Bachňáková Rózenfeldová.
*264 1$aOxford :$bOxford University Press,$c2022.
*300 $as. 1023–1031
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v17(12)
*520 $aCriminal enforcement of IP rights (IPRs) is a highly discussed and contentious issue. The underlying reasons for differing views in this regard relate to the justifications of sanctioning IPR infringements through criminal law instruments. Criminal law, although helpful in some cases of IPR infringements, where certain public interests are at stake (eg counterfeiting goods endangering public health), can be (ab)used by private parties to enforce their rights through state prosecution rather than civil litigation that may be too costly, lengthy or have unsatisfactory outcomes.
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$arikosoikeus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10425
*650 7$arikkomukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3699
*650 7$aväärennökset$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6848$2yso/fin
*651 7$aSlovakia $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p107479$2yso/fin
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v17(12).
*852 $hSA-JIPLP
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.