Hylly
Henkilönnimi Gommers, Carina, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Round-up of European enforcement case law in 2022
Julkaistu Oxford University Press, Oxford : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, ISSN 1747-1532 ; 18(3)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Whilst new challenges awaited us in 2022, with the war in Ukraine raging on and the economic downturn and high inflation, practitioners are still and rightfully so continuing to focus on IP Rights (IPRs). The most recent report on IP-intensive industries has shown again how important IPRs are for the economy and for the job market.1 Specifically regarding hybrid working, hybrid conferences and new technologies continued to present challenges in 2022 and, as far as IP is concerned, a specific focus was on non-fungible tokens and the Metaverse. To be able to embrace the future with its continued challenges, learning from the past is a must and, with that, this article aspires to be a helpful guide. The authors start by summarizing the relevant Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgments interpreting the Enforcement Directive2 before moving on to CJEU decisions pertaining to substantive IPRs. Part 3 covers the relevant decisions of national courts.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Henkilönnimi Leppink, Willem, kirjoittaja. Schneider, Marius, kirjoittaja.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1747-1532 ; 18(3)
*000 ab a ar
*00118885
*008 s2023||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aGommers, Carina,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aRound-up of European enforcement case law in 2022 /$cCarina Gommers, Willem Leppink, Marius Schneider.
*264 1$aOxford :$bOxford University Press,$c2023.
*300 $as. 182–198
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v18(3)
*520 $aWhilst new challenges awaited us in 2022, with the war in Ukraine raging on and the economic downturn and high inflation, practitioners are still and rightfully so continuing to focus on IP Rights (IPRs). The most recent report on IP-intensive industries has shown again how important IPRs are for the economy and for the job market.1 Specifically regarding hybrid working, hybrid conferences and new technologies continued to present challenges in 2022 and, as far as IP is concerned, a specific focus was on non-fungible tokens and the Metaverse. To be able to embrace the future with its continued challenges, learning from the past is a must and, with that, this article aspires to be a helpful guide. The authors start by summarizing the relevant Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgments interpreting the Enforcement Directive2 before moving on to CJEU decisions pertaining to substantive IPRs. Part 3 covers the relevant decisions of national courts.
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$apäätökset$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2868$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atavaramerkit$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1488
*650 7$amallioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11911$2yso/fin
*650 7$ateollisoikeus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3067
*651 7$aSuomi$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p94426
*651 7$aRanska$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p104968$2yso/fin
*651 7$aItalia$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105111$2yso/fin
*651 7$aAlankomaat$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105190
*651 7$aKroatia $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p107595$2yso/fin
*651 7$aPuola$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105244$2yso/fin
*651 7$aRuotsi$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p94383
*651 7$aBelgia$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105206$2yso/fin
*653 $aCJEU
*7001 $aLeppink, Willem,$ekirjoittaja.
*7001 $aSchneider, Marius,$ekirjoittaja.
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v18(3)
*852 $hSA-JIPLP
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.