Hylly
Henkilönnimi Lentner, Gabriel M., kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö International investment law and data, copyrights and performance requirements : a closer look at Einarsson v Canada
Julkaistu Oxford University Press, Oxford : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, ISSN 1747-1532 ; 18(6)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. The interface between international investment law and IP law is continuing to develop.1 After high profile investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) cases, in which investment tribunals decided disputes involving trade marks and patents,2 copyrights and data are next. In Einarsson v Canada, the Claimants argue that Canada—through legislation and government action—confiscatedtheir IP rights (IPRs) in seismic data in breach of investment protection standards provided for in NAFTA.3 This is the first known case in which copyright and data4 issues arise in investment arbitration, so the tribunal’s decision will have broad implications for the development of this area of law. With more than US$2.5 billion claimed, the financial stakes are extremely high as well. Against this backdrop and on the basis of existing case law, this article aims to analyse the many questions relating to IP protection under investment law that are still unresolved. The legal issues range from the question, whether and under what circumstances copyrights and data constitute a covered investment under international investment law, to the extent and contours of the level of protection offered to those investments under international law (specifically under the fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard and the prohibition against uncompensated expropriations) and its relationship with domestic law and international and multilateral IP treaties. In a first, the prohibition against performance requirements is also at issue. The case also showcases the continuing propertization and expansion of IP protection through investment arbitration from patents and trademarks to copyrights and data. The article thus also offers a case study for the general critique offered by some commentators in this regard.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1747-1532 ; 18(6)
*000 ab a ar
*00121307
*008 s2023||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aLentner, Gabriel M.,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aInternational investment law and data, copyrights and performance requirements :$ba closer look at Einarsson v Canada /$cGabriel M Lentner.
*264 1$aOxford :$bOxford University Press,$c2023.
*300 $as. 446–454
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v18(6)
*520 $aThe interface between international investment law and IP law is continuing to develop.1 After high profile investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) cases, in which investment tribunals decided disputes involving trade marks and patents,2 copyrights and data are next. In Einarsson v Canada, the Claimants argue that Canada—through legislation and government action—confiscatedtheir IP rights (IPRs) in seismic data in breach of investment protection standards provided for in NAFTA.3 This is the first known case in which copyright and data4 issues arise in investment arbitration, so the tribunal’s decision will have broad implications for the development of this area of law. With more than US$2.5 billion claimed, the financial stakes are extremely high as well. Against this backdrop and on the basis of existing case law, this article aims to analyse the many questions relating to IP protection under investment law that are still unresolved. The legal issues range from the question, whether and under what circumstances copyrights and data constitute a covered investment under international investment law, to the extent and contours of the level of protection offered to those investments under international law (specifically under the fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard and the prohibition against uncompensated expropriations) and its relationship with domestic law and international and multilateral IP treaties. In a first, the prohibition against performance requirements is also at issue. The case also showcases the continuing propertization and expansion of IP protection through investment arbitration from patents and trademarks to copyrights and data. The article thus also offers a case study for the general critique offered by some commentators in this regard.
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$akansainvälinen tekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11933$2yso/fin
*650 7$adata$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27250$2yso/fin
*650 7$asijoitustoiminta $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4321
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$akansainvälinen oikeus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p12347
*651 7$aYhdysvallat$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105078
*651 7$aKanada$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105377$2yso/fin
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v18(6)
*852 $hSA-JIPLP
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.