Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

*000      ab a        ar
*00121311
*008      s2023||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aPalmer, Jake,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aLidl v Tesco :$bLidl's Logo Infringed by Tesco's "Clubcard Price" Signs /$cJake Palmer.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2023.
*300  $as. 194-197
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEntertainment Law Review,$x0959-3799 ;$v34(6)
*520  $aThis article considers the judgment of the High Court in consolidated claims Lidl v Tesco and Tesco v Lidl. Regarding the former, the High Court found in favour of Lidl. The judge held that Tesco's use of its "Clubcard Price(s)" signs infringed copyright in the Lidl logo. Regarding the counterclaim, the High Court found in favour of Tesco: certain of Lidl's trademarks for the wordless background to the Lidl logo were invalid for bad faith. However, Tesco was still liable for infringing the valid trade mark (being the Lidl logo as a whole).
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$ateollisoikeus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3067
*650 7$atavaramerkit$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1488
*650 7$alogot$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3737$2yso/fin
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*651 7$aIso-Britannia$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p104990
*653  $atekijänoikeuden loukkaus
*830 0$aEntertainment Law Review,$x0959-3799 ;$v34(6)
*852  $hSA-Entertainment Law Review
^