Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö The polysemous contemporary concept : the rhetoric of the cultural industry
Julkaistu University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä : 2003.
SAB-luokituskoodi
Muu luokituskoodi
Ulkoasutiedot 244 sivua : kuvitettu ; 25 cm
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research, ISSN 0075-4625 ; 217
Huomautus väitöskirjasta
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Yhteenveto. The aim of the study is to deliver understanding on the change of the concept of the cultural industry. It also aims at explicating the situation of the neutral and positive use of the concept in contemporary cultural policies. The conceptual change is studied via analysing major Western traditions on this issue. A rhetorical point of view on conceptual history employed by Quentin Skinner is used as a methodological approach in the study. As a result the study proposes eight possible meanings in employing the concept of cultural industry: critical, dialectical, emancipatory, cynical, descriptive, normative, legitimatory and instrumental. They are historical layers and all of them employed also in contemporary situation. Each of these meanings point at a specific rhetorical re-description of the situation of cultural and aesthetic production. These re-descriptions legitimate the tone of writing and the meaning given to the concept. The study also proposes a pyramid model pointing at the criteria of application and a circle model pointing at the range or reference of the concept of the cultural industry.
Huomautus saatavuudesta toisessa ilmiasussa Julkaistu myös verkkoaineistona.
Asiasana
Aineiston lajityyppi/muoto
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research, 0075-4625 ; 217.
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:951-39-1534-4 Linkki verkkoaineistoon
ISBN
*00003266cam a2200769 i 4500
*00121562
*00520230711142902.0
*008030723s2003 fi ||||||m |||||||eng|
*015 $afx733005$2skl
*020 $a951-39-1457-7$qnidottu
*035 $a(FI-MELINDA)000271361
*040 $aFI-NL$bfin
*0410 $aeng$bfin
*042 $afinb
*084 $a06$2ykl
*1001 $aLoisa, Raija-Leena.
*24514$aThe polysemous contemporary concept :$bthe rhetoric of the cultural industry /$cRaija-Leena Loisa.
*260 $aJyväskylä :$bUniversity of Jyväskylä,$c2003.
*300 $a244 sivua :$bkuvitettu ;$c25 cm
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research,$x0075-4625 ;$v217
*502 $aVäitöskirja :$cJyväskylän yliopisto,$d2003.
*520 $aYhteenveto.
*520 $aThe aim of the study is to deliver understanding on the change of the concept of the cultural industry. It also aims at explicating the situation of the neutral and positive use of the concept in contemporary cultural policies. The conceptual change is studied via analysing major Western traditions on this issue. A rhetorical point of view on conceptual history employed by Quentin Skinner is used as a methodological approach in the study. As a result the study proposes eight possible meanings in employing the concept of cultural industry: critical, dialectical, emancipatory, cynical, descriptive, normative, legitimatory and instrumental. They are historical layers and all of them employed also in contemporary situation. Each of these meanings point at a specific rhetorical re-description of the situation of cultural and aesthetic production. These re-descriptions legitimate the tone of writing and the meaning given to the concept. The study also proposes a pyramid model pointing at the criteria of application and a circle model pointing at the range or reference of the concept of the cultural industry.
*530 $aJulkaistu myös verkkoaineistona.
*650 7$akulttuuriteollisuus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6041
*650 7$akäsitteet$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2267
*650 7$akäsiteanalyysi $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19406
*650 7$akulttuuriala$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19511
*650 7$akulttuuripolitiikka$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13671
*650 7$akulttuuri$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p372
*650 7$amediakulttuuri$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p15592
*650 7$apopulaarikulttuuri$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6
*650 7$amedia$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2445
*650 7$aviihde$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5
*650 7$aretoriikka$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p563
*655 7$aväitöskirjat$2slm/fin$0http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:au:slm:s1227
*830 0$aJyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research,$x0075-4625 ;$v217.
*852 $h06 LOI
*856 $uhttp://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:951-39-1534-4$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
*901 $aMU20030819$5FENNI
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Kuvausta ei toistaiseksi saatavana