Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö What Can Big Data Protection Learn from Trade Secret Protection?
Julkaistu Verlag C.H. Beck, München : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa GRUR International, ISSN 2632-8623 ; 72(6)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. The nature of big data protection remains an enigma. By ‘big data ’, we refer to data that are non-copyrightable, non-secret and do not fall into the scope of existing intellectual property laws. Assuming such data do require some sort of protection in order to incentivize investment, what form shall the protection take? Contract law, tort law, unfair competition law or a sui generis intellectual property law? There is no consensus among different jurisdictions. Some jurisdictions follow a property law approach. For example, the EU has been offering sui generis IP protection to data bases with Directive 96/9/EC on the Legal Protection of Data bases. In contrast, many other jurisdictions choose to follow a non-property law approach. Take the United States for example. A century after International News Service v Associated Press, in which the misappropriation doctrine was used to offer ad hoc protection to hot news, the US still has not introduced a sui generis right. Even though non-copyrightable, non-secret and valuable data do receive some legal protection, the ideal form of protection is yet to be clarified.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke GRUR International, 2632-8623 ; 72(6)
*000 ab a ar
*00121575
*008 s2023||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aJiang, Ge,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aWhat Can Big Data Protection Learn from Trade Secret Protection? /$cGe Jiang.
*264 1$aMünchen :$bVerlag C.H. Beck,$c2023.
*300 $as. 525–526
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v72(6)
*520 $aThe nature of big data protection remains an enigma. By ‘big data ’, we refer to data that are non-copyrightable, non-secret and do not fall into the scope of existing intellectual property laws. Assuming such data do require some sort of protection in order to incentivize investment, what form shall the protection take? Contract law, tort law, unfair competition law or a sui generis intellectual property law? There is no consensus among different jurisdictions. Some jurisdictions follow a property law approach. For example, the EU has been offering sui generis IP protection to data bases with Directive 96/9/EC on the Legal Protection of Data bases. In contrast, many other jurisdictions choose to follow a non-property law approach. Take the United States for example. A century after International News Service v Associated Press, in which the misappropriation doctrine was used to offer ad hoc protection to hot news, the US still has not introduced a sui generis right. Even though non-copyrightable, non-secret and valuable data do receive some legal protection, the ideal form of protection is yet to be clarified.
*650 7$abig data $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27202
*650 7$alainsäädäntö$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13854
*650 7$aammattisalaisuus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9524
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atietokannat$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3056$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*651 7$aEurooppa$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p94111
*651 7$aYhdysvallat$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105078
*830 0$aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v72(6)
*852 $hSA-GRUR International
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.