Hylly
Henkilönnimi Yuvaraj, Joshua, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Implementing copyright revocation in Ireland and Malta : lessons for lawmakers
Julkaistu Oxford University Press, Oxford : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, ISSN 1747-1532 ; 18(7)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Article 22 of the European Union’s (EU’s) Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive requires EU Member States to permit creators to revoke copyright grants if there is a ‘lack of exploitation’ of the works. These types of provisions can help creators remonetize and increase the availability of works that may have gone dormant, especially in the context of concerns about imbalanced bargaining relationships between creators and publishers. In recent years, proposals for such laws have emerged in Canada, South Africa and the UK, while pre-existing reversion laws in the USA have caused high-profile disputes between artists, record companies and movie studios. Policymakers in these and other countries considering implementing or amending reversion laws will benefit from careful consideration of how reversion is being implemented and used elsewhere. To that end, this article evaluates the implementation of Article 22 in Ireland and Malta (given their similar lack of previous reversion laws and common law heritage). It identifies positive elements of the Article 22 transposition in those countries, while also highlighting issues with the substance and procedure of their transposed reversion provisions. This article then draws broader normative lessons from this analysis for policymakers considering implementing or amending reversion rights in their copyright laws.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1747-1532 ; 18(7)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad047 Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000 ab a ar
*00121630
*008 s2023||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aYuvaraj, Joshua,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aImplementing copyright revocation in Ireland and Malta :$blessons for lawmakers /$cJoshua Yuvaraj.
*264 1$aOxford :$bOxford University Press,$c2023.
*300 $as. 528–545
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v18(7)
*520 $aArticle 22 of the European Union’s (EU’s) Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive requires EU Member States to permit creators to revoke copyright grants if there is a ‘lack of exploitation’ of the works. These types of provisions can help creators remonetize and increase the availability of works that may have gone dormant, especially in the context of concerns about imbalanced bargaining relationships between creators and publishers. In recent years, proposals for such laws have emerged in Canada, South Africa and the UK, while pre-existing reversion laws in the USA have caused high-profile disputes between artists, record companies and movie studios. Policymakers in these and other countries considering implementing or amending reversion laws will benefit from careful consideration of how reversion is being implemented and used elsewhere. To that end, this article evaluates the implementation of Article 22 in Ireland and Malta (given their similar lack of previous reversion laws and common law heritage). It identifies positive elements of the Article 22 transposition in those countries, while also highlighting issues with the substance and procedure of their transposed reversion provisions. This article then draws broader normative lessons from this analysis for policymakers considering implementing or amending reversion rights in their copyright laws.
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-direktiivit$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10768$2yso/fin
*650 7$alainsäädäntö$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13854
*651 7$aIrlanti$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105195$2yso/fin
*651 7$aMalta $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105323$2yso/fin
*653 $aDSM-direktiivi
*653 $aArtikla 22
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v18(7)
*852 $hSA-JIPLP
*85641$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad047$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.