Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

 
The Evolution of the Perception of Artificial Intelligence in the EU : The Case of Judicial Administration
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Henkilönnimi
  • Terzidou, Kalliopi, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • The Evolution of the Perception of Artificial Intelligence in the EU : The Case of Judicial Administration
Julkaistu
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Recht und Informatik e.V. (DGRI), 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • 1 verkkoaineisto (11 sivua)
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, ISSN 2190-3387 ; 14(3)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Efficiency of judicial administration is one of the priorities of justice systems, it acts as a means to achieve effective administration of justice and wider access to courts through minimum spending of resources. One element associated with a satisfactory level of court efficiency is the integra- tion and use of digital technologies by judicial staff. Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands out as a superior al- ternative to traditional digital technologies due to its use of Machine Learning (ML), to achieve desig- nated goals. This article will trace the evolution EU policymakers’ understanding of AI in the context of EU Member States’ courts integrating AI systems to efficiently automate their judicial administration. By comparing AI definitions provided by EU bodies, specifically referencing the proposed AI Act, this article highlights the commonly accepted characteristics of AI. Additionally, it examines arguments put forth by leading computer scientists regarding the interpretation of “intelligence” in artificial artifacts. We will find that AI systems are perceived as systems employing ML and logic and knowledge-based approaches that are capable of mimicking basic human cognitive functions to autonomously automate manual tasks. These findings will be followed by remarks on the necessary steps for the integration of AI-based applications in EU justice systems.
Asiasana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 2190-3387 ; 14(3)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-14-3-2023/5842/the%20evolution%20of%20the%20perception%20of%20artificial%20intelligence%20in%20the%20eu-%20the%20case%20of%20judicial%20administration.pdf Linkki verkkoaineistoon 
*000      ab a        ar
*00122639
*008      s2023    gw     e|    |||||0|eng |            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*041  $aeng
*1001 $aTerzidou, Kalliopi,$ekirjoittaja.
*24514$aThe Evolution of the Perception of Artificial Intelligence in the EU :$bThe Case of Judicial Administration /$cKalliopi Terzidou.
*264 1$bDeutsche Gesellschaft für Recht und Informatik e.V. (DGRI),$c2023.
*300  $a1 verkkoaineisto (11 sivua)
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $atietokonekäyttöinen$bc$2rdamedia
*338  $averkkoaineisto$bcr$2rdacarrier
*347  $atekstitiedosto$bHTML
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v14(3)
*520  $aEfficiency of judicial administration is one of the priorities of justice systems, it acts as a means to achieve effective administration of justice and wider access to courts through minimum spending of resources. One element associated with a satisfactory level of court efficiency is the integra- tion and use of digital technologies by judicial staff. Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands out as a superior al- ternative to traditional digital technologies due to its use of Machine Learning (ML), to achieve desig- nated goals. This article will trace the evolution EU policymakers’ understanding of AI in the context of EU Member States’ courts integrating AI systems to efficiently automate their judicial administration. By comparing AI definitions provided by EU bodies, specifically referencing the proposed AI Act, this article highlights the commonly accepted characteristics of AI. Additionally, it examines arguments put forth by leading computer scientists regarding the interpretation of “intelligence” in artificial artifacts. We will find that AI systems are perceived as systems employing ML and logic and knowledge-based approaches that are capable of mimicking basic human cognitive functions to autonomously automate manual tasks. These findings will be followed by remarks on the necessary steps for the integration of AI-based applications in EU justice systems.
*650 7$atekoäly$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2616
*650 7$aoikeushallinto$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p320$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v14(3)
*85640$uhttps://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-14-3-2023/5842/the%20evolution%20of%20the%20perception%20of%20artificial%20intelligence%20in%20the%20eu-%20the%20case%20of%20judicial%20administration.pdf$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä