Henkilönnimi Wolters, Pieter, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Towards a better notice and act ion mechanism in the DSA
Julkaistu Deutsche Gesellschaft für Recht und Informatik e.V. (DGRI), 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot 1 verkkoaineisto (17 sivua)
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, ISSN 2190-3387 ; 14(3)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. The adoption of the DSA will bring important changes in the content moderation landscape in the EU. By harmonising, codifying, and further developing a notice and act ion mechanism, the DSA addresses many content moderation-related challenges, and in so doing also affects the balance that existed thus far between the protection of victims of illegal content, the safeguarding of fundamental rights and the economic interests of hosting service providers. This contribution answers the following question: Does the notice and act ion mechanism of the DSA create an adequate balance between the various involved interests? As far as the economic interests of hosting service providers are concerned, the harmonisation of the mechanism should certainly be a welcome change for economic operators. Further, even though the DSA contains many new procedural obligations, they entail reasonable efforts. The requirement of a harmonised, efficient, effective and user-friendly notification procedures should fix the existing limitations and can be seen as an important step for the protection of the victims’ interests. However, the lack of an obligation to provide a statement of reasons to notifiers is a missed opportunity. Finally, the safeguards of content providers’ fundamental rights are also enhanced. Not only through the creation of new redress mechanisms, but also through the hosting provider services ’ obligation to provide decisions that are objective, non-arbitrary, diligent and timely, and to justify them through a statement of reasons. Although the applicability of the safeguards is still too narrow in some respects, the new safeguards and their requirements should improve the current situation in which hardly any binding legal provisions exist. All in all, even though it contains various shortcomings that prevent it from truly striking an adequate balance, the DSA’s notice and act ion mechanism does represent a significant step forward for all the parties that have a stake in the moderation of online content.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Henkilönnimi Gellert, Raphaël, kirjoittaja.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 2190-3387 ; 14(3)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-14-3-2023/5845/towards%20dsa.pdf Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000 ab a ar
*00122643
*008 s2023 gw e| |||||0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*041 $aeng
*1001 $aWolters, Pieter,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aTowards a better notice and act ion mechanism in the DSA /$cPieter Wolters, Raphaël Gellert.
*264 1$bDeutsche Gesellschaft für Recht und Informatik e.V. (DGRI),$c2023.
*300 $a1 verkkoaineisto (17 sivua)
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $atietokonekäyttöinen$bc$2rdamedia
*338 $averkkoaineisto$bcr$2rdacarrier
*347 $atekstitiedosto$bPDF
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v14(3)
*520 $aThe adoption of the DSA will bring important changes in the content moderation landscape in the EU. By harmonising, codifying, and further developing a notice and act ion mechanism, the DSA addresses many content moderation-related challenges, and in so doing also affects the balance that existed thus far between the protection of victims of illegal content, the safeguarding of fundamental rights and the economic interests of hosting service providers. This contribution answers the following question: Does the notice and act ion mechanism of the DSA create an adequate balance between the various involved interests? As far as the economic interests of hosting service providers are concerned, the harmonisation of the mechanism should certainly be a welcome change for economic operators. Further, even though the DSA contains many new procedural obligations, they entail reasonable efforts. The requirement of a harmonised, efficient, effective and user-friendly notification procedures should fix the existing limitations and can be seen as an important step for the protection of the victims’ interests. However, the lack of an obligation to provide a statement of reasons to notifiers is a missed opportunity. Finally, the safeguards of content providers’ fundamental rights are also enhanced. Not only through the creation of new redress mechanisms, but also through the hosting provider services ’ obligation to provide decisions that are objective, non-arbitrary, diligent and timely, and to justify them through a statement of reasons. Although the applicability of the safeguards is still too narrow in some respects, the new safeguards and their requirements should improve the current situation in which hardly any binding legal provisions exist. All in all, even though it contains various shortcomings that prevent it from truly striking an adequate balance, the DSA’s notice and act ion mechanism does represent a significant step forward for all the parties that have a stake in the moderation of online content.
*650 7$averkkopalvelut$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6624$2yso/fin
*650 7$asisällönsuodatus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23049$2yso/fin
*650 7$alakien yhdenmukaistaminen$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p28637$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*653 $aDigital Services Act (DSA)
*7001 $aGellert, Raphaël,$ekirjoittaja.
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v14(3)
*85640$uhttps://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-14-3-2023/5845/towards%20dsa.pdf$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.