Henkilönnimi Kangas, Anita, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Institutionalism, cultural institutions and cultural policy in the Nordic countries
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot 1 verkkoaineisto (20 sivua)
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift, ISSN 2000-8325 ; 13(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. In the article our aim is to analyse theoretically the questions: (1) what is the relevance of institutional approach in research about cultural policy and cultural institutions, and (2) how do the modern cultural institutions change. Cultural policy and cultural institutions cannot escape the strong mechanisms for change in their environments. The continuous urge to change and adapt to new conditions causes dynamics and instability and permanence in the institutions. Our empirical references concerning Nordic countries is twofold: On one hand we consider cultural policy making as an institutional formation taking place in concrete historical contexts; on the other we refer to cultural institutions in a traditional sense. By analysing institutionalist theories we will present reflections on what might be the contribution of this theoretical tradition to understand and explain developments in cultural policy making and in traditional cultural institutions. We ask if Nordic cultural policy has proven its resilience to globalization and neoliberalism in spite of the economic crisis of the 1990s. The main idea is that the concept of path dependency can be used as an explanation for cultural policy resilience. – In the analysis one argument is that the Nordic model has been changed in a liberal direction, but changes are not significant enough to replace the original model. We argue that the Nordic model is still far less resilient towards changes that lead to a less on public funding based cultural policy towards more marked based ideas. However, after the economic crisis was over at the end of the 1990s, some of the things been changing. For example, more public funding is targeted to support instrumentalisation of art and culture to strengthen national economic competitiveness.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Henkilönnimi Vestheim, Geir, kirjoittaja.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift, 2000-8325 ; 13(2)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN2000-8325-2010-02-08 Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000 ab a ar
*00122715
*008 s2011 no e| |||||0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*041 $aeng
*1001 $aKangas, Anita,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aInstitutionalism, cultural institutions and cultural policy in the Nordic countries /$cAnita Kangas, Geir Vestheim.
*264 1$c2011.
*300 $a1 verkkoaineisto (20 sivua)
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $atietokonekäyttöinen$bc$2rdamedia
*338 $averkkoaineisto$bcr$2rdacarrier
*347 $atekstitiedosto$bHTML/PDF
*4901 $aNordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift,$x2000-8325 ;$v13(2)
*520 $aIn the article our aim is to analyse theoretically the questions: (1) what is the relevance of institutional approach in research about cultural policy and cultural institutions, and (2) how do the modern cultural institutions change. Cultural policy and cultural institutions cannot escape the strong mechanisms for change in their environments. The continuous urge to change and adapt to new conditions causes dynamics and instability and permanence in the institutions. Our empirical references concerning Nordic countries is twofold: On one hand we consider cultural policy making as an institutional formation taking place in concrete historical contexts; on the other we refer to cultural institutions in a traditional sense. By analysing institutionalist theories we will present reflections on what might be the contribution of this theoretical tradition to understand and explain developments in cultural policy making and in traditional cultural institutions. We ask if Nordic cultural policy has proven its resilience to globalization and neoliberalism in spite of the economic crisis of the 1990s. The main idea is that the concept of path dependency can be used as an explanation for cultural policy resilience. – In the analysis one argument is that the Nordic model has been changed in a liberal direction, but changes are not significant enough to replace the original model. We argue that the Nordic model is still far less resilient towards changes that lead to a less on public funding based cultural policy towards more marked based ideas. However, after the economic crisis was over at the end of the 1990s, some of the things been changing. For example, more public funding is targeted to support instrumentalisation of art and culture to strengthen national economic competitiveness.
*650 7$akulttuuripolitiikka$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13671
*650 7$akulttuurilaitokset $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17750
*651 7$aPohjoismaat$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p94350
*7001 $aVestheim, Geir,$ekirjoittaja.
*830 0$aNordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift,$x2000-8325 ;$v13(2)
*85640$uhttps://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN2000-8325-2010-02-08$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.