Hylly
Henkilönnimi Sprenger, Tim, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Enforcing Put Backs in German and European Law
Julkaistu Verlag C.H. Beck, München : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa GRUR International, ISSN 2632-8623 ; 72(10)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. While ‘takedowns’ are a familiar term in the liability and regulation of online platforms, the opposite act of reuploading legal content after an incorrect takedown, the so-called ‘put back’, does not receive the same amount of attention. This paper aims to provide an overview of different legal bases of put back claims against platforms in German and European law. Even though the procedural approach to platform governance with its internal complaint-handling systems is one way to mitigate incorrect decisions, the recourse to the courts also needs to be viable. The paper concludes on a positive note showing numerous existing legal bases of put backs, especially in contract law. Nevertheless, the safest way would be the implementation of an explicit legal base for put back claims, for which the paper offers a proposal for discussion.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke GRUR International, 2632-8623 ; 72(10)
*000 ab a ar
*00122762
*008 s2023 gw e| |||||0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aSprenger, Tim,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aEnforcing Put Backs in German and European Law /$cTim Sprenger.
*264 1$aMünchen :$bVerlag C.H. Beck,$c2023.
*300 $as. 933–938
*336 $2rdacontent$ateksti$btxt
*337 $2rdamedia$akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn
*338 $2rdacarrier$anide$bnc
*4901 $aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v72(10)
*520 $aWhile ‘takedowns’ are a familiar term in the liability and regulation of online platforms, the opposite act of reuploading legal content after an incorrect takedown, the so-called ‘put back’, does not receive the same amount of attention. This paper aims to provide an overview of different legal bases of put back claims against platforms in German and European law. Even though the procedural approach to platform governance with its internal complaint-handling systems is one way to mitigate incorrect decisions, the recourse to the courts also needs to be viable. The paper concludes on a positive note showing numerous existing legal bases of put backs, especially in contract law. Nevertheless, the safest way would be the implementation of an explicit legal base for put back claims, for which the paper offers a proposal for discussion.
*650 7$averkkopalvelut$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6624$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*650 7$asisällönsuodatus $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23049$2yso/fin
*650 7$asopimusoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20249$2yso/fin
*650 7$atäytäntöönpano$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4246
*651 7$aSaksa$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105087$2yso/fin
*830 0$aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v72(10)
*852 $hSA-GRUR International
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.