Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

The localization of IP infringements in the online environment : from Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 and the Metaverse
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-JIPLP
Henkilönnimi
  • Rosati, Eleonora, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • The localization of IP infringements in the online environment : from Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 and the Metaverse
Julkaistu
  • Oxford University Press, Oxford : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 720–742
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, ISSN 1747-1532 ; 18(10)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Over time, technological advancements have resulted in novel ways both to exploit content and to infringe rights—including intellectual property rights (IPRs)—vesting in them. Legislative instruments have consistently clarified that pre-existing rights continue to apply to new media, ie, means to disseminate intangible assets, including in digital and online contexts. In terms of rights enforcement, however, the progressive dematerialization of content and dissemination modalities has given rise to challenges, including when it comes to determining where an alleged IPR infringement has been committed. This study seeks to answer the following questions: (1) Can the same criteria and notions developed in relation to other dissemination media find application in the context of IPR infringements carried out through and within the metaverse? (2) Does the distinction between centralized and decentralized metaverses have substantial implications for the localization of IPR infringements? The first question is answered in the affirmative. In relation to the second question, it is submitted that the distinction between centralized and decentralized metaverses—while of substantial relevance to the determination of enforcement options—may not have significant implications insofar as the localization of IPR infringements is concerned.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1747-1532 ; 18(10)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad077 Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000      ab a        ar
*00122876
*008      s2023    xxk    e     |||| 0|eng |            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aRosati, Eleonora,$ekirjoittaja.
*24514$aThe localization of IP infringements in the online environment :$bfrom Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 and the Metaverse /$cEleonora Rosati.
*264 1$aOxford :$bOxford University Press,$c2023.
*300  $as. 720–742
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v18(10)
*520  $aOver time, technological advancements have resulted in novel ways both to exploit content and to infringe rights—including intellectual property rights (IPRs)—vesting in them. Legislative instruments have consistently clarified that pre-existing rights continue to apply to new media, ie, means to disseminate intangible assets, including in digital and online contexts. In terms of rights enforcement, however, the progressive dematerialization of content and dissemination modalities has given rise to challenges, including when it comes to determining where an alleged IPR infringement has been committed. This study seeks to answer the following questions: (1) Can the same criteria and notions developed in relation to other dissemination media find application in the context of IPR infringements carried out through and within the metaverse? (2) Does the distinction between centralized and decentralized metaverses have substantial implications for the localization of IPR infringements? The first question is answered in the affirmative. In relation to the second question, it is submitted that the distinction between centralized and decentralized metaverses—while of substantial relevance to the determination of enforcement options—may not have significant implications insofar as the localization of IPR infringements is concerned.
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$ateknologinen kehitys$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8956
*653  $ametaversumi
*653  $aweb 3.0
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v18(10)
*852  $hSA-JIPLP
*856  $uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad077$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
Ex1Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoKirjasto SA-JIPLP