Hylly
Henkilönnimi Perry, Thomas, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö The Technological Paradox : The Conflict between Territoriality and New Forms of Dissemination
Julkaistu Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa European Intellectual Property Review, ISSN 0142-0461 ; 45(12)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. In AKM, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) recently ruled that under art.1(2)(b) of Directive 93/83, satellite broadcasting organisations that satisfy certain conditions are only required to obtain authorisation in the Member State where programme-carrying signals are introduced. The effect of this is that authorisation does not have to be obtained in Member States where satellite signals can potentially be received. As this appears contrary to Airfield, this article considers some of the implications of the ruling, not just for satellite broadcasting, but also with respect to the general communication to the public right contained within art.3(1) of Directive 2001/29.
Yhteisönnimi
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Henkilönnimi Hyland, Mark, kirjoittaja.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke European Intellectual Property Review, 0142-0461 ; 45(12)
*000 ab a ar
*00122934
*008 s2023 xxk e |||| 0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aPerry, Thomas,$ekirjoittaja.
*24514$aThe Technological Paradox :$bThe Conflict between Territoriality and New Forms of Dissemination /$cThomas Perry, Dr Mark Hyland.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2023.
*300 $as. 746-750
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v45(12)
*520 $aIn AKM, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) recently ruled that under art.1(2)(b) of Directive 93/83, satellite broadcasting organisations that satisfy certain conditions are only required to obtain authorisation in the Member State where programme-carrying signals are introduced. The effect of this is that authorisation does not have to be obtained in Member States where satellite signals can potentially be received. As this appears contrary to Airfield, this article considers some of the implications of the ruling, not just for satellite broadcasting, but also with respect to the general communication to the public right contained within art.3(1) of Directive 2001/29.
*61024$aEuroopan unioni$0(FI-ASTERI-N)000035482
*61024$aEuroopan unionin tuomioistuin$0(FI-ASTERI-N)000031936
*650 7$asatelliittitelevisio $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11418
*650 7$atelevisiotekniikka$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10538
*650 7$atelevisio (joukkoviestimet)$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5759
*650 7$atelevisiointi$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9779
*650 7$atelevisioyhtiöt$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10456
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-direktiivit$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10768$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*653 $ayleisölle välittäminen
*653 $atekijänoikeusjärjestöt
*7001 $aHyland, Mark,$ekirjoittaja.
*830 0$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v45(12)
*852 $hSA-EIPR
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.