Hylly SA-Entertainment Law Review
Henkilönnimi Wilson-Bushell, Andrew, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Bitcoin Revisited : File Format Capable of Copyright Protection if Structure Recorded
Julkaistu Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Entertainment Law Review, ISSN 0959-3799 ; 35(1)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. In Wright v BTC Core, Dr Craig Wright had claimed to own copyright in the electronic file format used in the Bitcoin digital currency system. As considered in our previous article on the decision at first instance, the High Court held that the claim had no real prospect of success and refused permission to appeal. Yet the Court of Appeal granted permission and allowed the appeal, finding that, although the content did not define the structure of the file format, the claimants still had a real prospect of success in showing fixation (and so copyright subsistence) if the structure was completely and unambiguously recorded.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Henkilönnimi Edwards, Charlie, kirjoittaja.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Entertainment Law Review, 0959-3799 ; 35(1)
*000 ab a ar
*00123092
*008 s2024 xxk e |||| 0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aWilson-Bushell, Andrew,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aBitcoin Revisited :$bFile Format Capable of Copyright Protection if Structure Recorded /$cAndrew Wilson-Bushell, Charlie Edwards.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2024.
*300 $as. 37-41
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEntertainment Law Review,$x0959-3799 ;$v35(1)
*520 $aIn Wright v BTC Core, Dr Craig Wright had claimed to own copyright in the electronic file format used in the Bitcoin digital currency system. As considered in our previous article on the decision at first instance, the High Court held that the claim had no real prospect of success and refused permission to appeal. Yet the Court of Appeal granted permission and allowed the appeal, finding that, although the content did not define the structure of the file format, the claimants still had a real prospect of success in showing fixation (and so copyright subsistence) if the structure was completely and unambiguously recorded.
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$avirtuaalivaluutta $0https://yso.fi/onto/yso/p28873$2yso/fin
*651 7$aIso-Britannia$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p104990
*7001 $aEdwards, Charlie,$ekirjoittaja.
*830 0$aEntertainment Law Review,$x0959-3799 ;$v35(1)
*852 $hSA-Entertainment Law Review
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.