Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

 
Multi-Level Cultural Policy and Politics of European Capitals of Culture
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Henkilönnimi
  • Palonen, Emilia, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Multi-Level Cultural Policy and Politics of European Capitals of Culture
Julkaistu
  • 2010.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • 1 verkkoaineisto (22 sivua)
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift, ISSN 2000-8325 ; 13(1)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Rather than exploring culture-led urban transformations, media representations or city-image building, this article tackles the way in which the European capitals of culture (ECOC) has been a local, regional, national or European task. The responsibility for the event and the possibility to use it to articulate political identities is transferred from one level to another. This article discusses the ECOC as multi-level policy on European, national, regional and local levels. It works on the macro-level drawing from many of the recent ECOCs and hopes to inspire more in-depth analysis of case studies. Moreover, the article recognises the difference between explicit and implicit policies. The European Union, having been legally deprived of the chance to run explicit official policies until the Maastricht treaty in 1992, has still provided support for culture through implicit cultural policies and cultural policies of display, such as the ECOC. The cases considered in this paper vary, as the main emphasis is the exploration of the role of the ECOCs and the multiple levels in the process. However, quite often references would be made to recent Capitals of Culture, such as Sibiu and Luxembourg in 2007, Vilnius in 2009, Ruhr 2010 and Turku 2011. They highlight particularly well the conflicts between the levels, especially local and national, as well as the role of the region in the construction of a common reference point in the ECC process.
Yhteisönnimi
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift, 2000-8325 ; 13(1)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN2000-8325-2010-01-07 Linkki verkkoaineistoon 
*000      ab a        ar
*00123274
*008      s2010    no     e|    |||||0|eng |            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*041  $aeng
*1001 $aPalonen, Emilia,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aMulti-Level Cultural Policy and Politics of European Capitals of Culture /$cEmilia Palonen.
*264 1$c2010.
*300  $a1 verkkoaineisto (22 sivua)
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $atietokonekäyttöinen$bc$2rdamedia
*338  $averkkoaineisto$bcr$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aNordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift,$x2000-8325 ;$v13(1)
*520  $aRather than exploring culture-led urban transformations, media representations or city-image building, this article tackles the way in which the European capitals of culture (ECOC) has been a local, regional, national or European task. The responsibility for the event and the possibility to use it to articulate political identities is transferred from one level to another. This article discusses the ECOC as multi-level policy on European, national, regional and local levels. It works on the macro-level drawing from many of the recent ECOCs and hopes to inspire more in-depth analysis of case studies. Moreover, the article recognises the difference between explicit and implicit policies. The European Union, having been legally deprived of the chance to run explicit official policies until the Maastricht treaty in 1992, has still provided support for culture through implicit cultural policies and cultural policies of display, such as the ECOC. The cases considered in this paper vary, as the main emphasis is the exploration of the role of the ECOCs and the multiple levels in the process. However, quite often references would be made to recent Capitals of Culture, such as Sibiu and Luxembourg in 2007, Vilnius in 2009, Ruhr 2010 and Turku 2011. They highlight particularly well the conflicts between the levels, especially local and national, as well as the role of the region in the construction of a common reference point in the ECC process.
*61024$aEuroopan unioni$0(FI-ASTERI-N)000035482
*650 7$akulttuuripolitiikka$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13671
*650 7$akulttuuripääkaupungit$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17961
*650 7$amonikulttuurisuus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10647
*651 7$aEurooppa$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p94111
*830 0$aNordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift,$x2000-8325 ;$v13(1)
*85640$uhttps://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN2000-8325-2010-01-07$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä