Hylly SA-Entertainment Law Review
Henkilönnimi Wilson-Bushell, Andrew, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö CJEU Scrutinises Facebook's Use of Personal Data for Behavioural Advertising
Julkaistu Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Entertainment Law Review, ISSN 0959-3799 ; 35(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. In Meta Platforms Inc v Bundeskartellamt (C-252/21), the Court of Justice of the European Union found that Meta failed to establish a legal basis for processing personal data for the purpose of behavioural targeting of adverts. That might put Meta in the tricky position of relying on its user's consent for such purposes, which much be express, freely given, informed and revocable. The CJEU also decided that the German competition authority can assess compliance with national law (in this case, the GDPR) when assessing whether there has been an abuse of a dominant position, as long as the authority consults with the relevant data protection authorities.
Yhteisönnimi
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Entertainment Law Review, 0959-3799 ; 35(2)
*000 ab a ar
*00124314
*008 s2024 xxk e |||| 0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aWilson-Bushell, Andrew,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aCJEU Scrutinises Facebook's Use of Personal Data for Behavioural Advertising /$cAndrew Wilson-Bushell.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2024.
*300 $as. 95-97
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEntertainment Law Review,$x0959-3799 ;$v35(2)
*520 $aIn Meta Platforms Inc v Bundeskartellamt (C-252/21), the Court of Justice of the European Union found that Meta failed to establish a legal basis for processing personal data for the purpose of behavioural targeting of adverts. That might put Meta in the tricky position of relying on its user's consent for such purposes, which much be express, freely given, informed and revocable. The CJEU also decided that the German competition authority can assess compliance with national law (in this case, the GDPR) when assessing whether there has been an abuse of a dominant position, as long as the authority consults with the relevant data protection authorities.
*61024$aEuroopan unionin tuomioistuin$0(FI-ASTERI-N)000031936
*650 7$atietosuoja$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3636$2yso/fin
*650 7$ahenkilötiedot $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p15126
*650 7$amainonta$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1232$2yso/fin
*650 7$aFacebook$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p21063$2yso/fin
*651 7$aSaksa$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105087$2yso/fin
*653 $aGDPR
*830 0$aEntertainment Law Review,$x0959-3799 ;$v35(2)
*852 $hSA-Entertainment Law Review
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.