Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

The stunted development of unfair competition law in the United States and Canada
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-JIPLP
Henkilönnimi
  • Farley, Christine Haight, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • The stunted development of unfair competition law in the United States and Canada
Julkaistu
  • Oxford University Press, Oxford : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 101–108
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, ISSN 1747-1532 ; 19(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Both the United States and Canada present unfair competition law in a way that is complex and indicative of their kindred beginnings. Sharing a closely paralleled history in the development of unfair competition law, these countries exhibit unique similarities in both substance and approach, likely not found in any other jurisdiction. Born out of English common law, the early trajectory of unfair competition was inextricably linked to trade mark law. Both countries’ legislatures passed ambitious trade mark statutes that created federal regulation of certain areas of unfair competition, while also reserving large areas for the state or provincial legislatures to regulate. Claimants therefore navigate substantial variety in unfair competition protections depending on the cause of action. Even so, obligations under international agreements such as the Paris Convention and interaction with other bodies of law further extend the unfair competition legal landscape. Despite its complexity, the United States and Canada share remarkably similar paths to unfair competition protection. Understanding their history, limited national legislative powers, policy rationales, obligations under international agreements and the interplay between federal and state or provincial law create a rich and multifaceted unfair competition landscape.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1747-1532 ; 19(2)
*000      ab a        ar
*00124500
*008      s2024    xxk    e     |||| 0|eng |            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aFarley, Christine Haight,$ekirjoittaja.
*24514$aThe stunted development of unfair competition law in the United States and Canada /$cChristine Haight Farley.
*264 1$aOxford :$bOxford University Press,$c2024.
*300  $as. 101–108
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v19(2)
*520  $aBoth the United States and Canada present unfair competition law in a way that is complex and indicative of their kindred beginnings. Sharing a closely paralleled history in the development of unfair competition law, these countries exhibit unique similarities in both substance and approach, likely not found in any other jurisdiction. Born out of English common law, the early trajectory of unfair competition was inextricably linked to trade mark law. Both countries’ legislatures passed ambitious trade mark statutes that created federal regulation of certain areas of unfair competition, while also reserving large areas for the state or provincial legislatures to regulate. Claimants therefore navigate substantial variety in unfair competition protections depending on the cause of action. Even so, obligations under international agreements such as the Paris Convention and interaction with other bodies of law further extend the unfair competition legal landscape. Despite its complexity, the United States and Canada share remarkably similar paths to unfair competition protection. Understanding their history, limited national legislative powers, policy rationales, obligations under international agreements and the interplay between federal and state or provincial law create a rich and multifaceted unfair competition landscape.
*650 7$akilpailuoikeus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19178
*650 7$akansainväliset sopimukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p322
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$avertaileva oikeustiede$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11192$2yso/fin
*650 7$atavaramerkkilaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p21904
*651 7$aYhdysvallat$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105078
*651 7$aKanada$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105377$2yso/fin
*653  $aPariisin sopimus
*653  $avilpillinen kilpailu
*653  $aTRIPS
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v19(2)
*852  $hSA-JIPLP
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
Ex1Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoKirjasto SA-JIPLP