Henkilönnimi Meeker, Heather J., kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Open Source and the Age of Enforcement
Julkaistu University of California, Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco, CA : 2012.
Ulkoasutiedot 1 verkkoaineisto (25 sivua)
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Hastings science & technology law journal, ISSN 2331-835X ; 4(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. The last five years have seen the first serious enforcement efforts by licensors of open source software, so we are truly at the dawning of the age of enforcement. But open source claims are not like other claims. Understanding the distinctions between open source software claims and other intellectual property claims is key to reacting to open source claims gracefully, effectively, and with a minimum of embarrassment and cost. This Article provides a survey of where we stand today and demonstrates how this area of law has developed. We will be soon nearing the point where catalogs of open source claims in articles like this one will no longer be sensible or useful, but for now, seeing where we have been neatly explains where we are.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Hastings science & technology law journal, 2331-835X ; 4(2)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_science_technology_law_journal/vol4/iss2/5 Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000 ab a ar
*00124524
*008 s2012 xxu e| |||||0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*041 $aeng
*1001 $aMeeker, Heather J.,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aOpen Source and the Age of Enforcement /$cHeather J. Meeker.
*264 1$aSan Francisco, CA :$bUniversity of California, Hastings College of the Law,$c2012.
*300 $a1 verkkoaineisto (25 sivua)
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $atietokonekäyttöinen$bc$2rdamedia
*338 $averkkoaineisto$bcr$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aHastings science & technology law journal,$x2331-835X ;$v4(2)
*520 $aThe last five years have seen the first serious enforcement efforts by licensors of open source software, so we are truly at the dawning of the age of enforcement. But open source claims are not like other claims. Understanding the distinctions between open source software claims and other intellectual property claims is key to reacting to open source claims gracefully, effectively, and with a minimum of embarrassment and cost. This Article provides a survey of where we stand today and demonstrates how this area of law has developed. We will be soon nearing the point where catalogs of open source claims in articles like this one will no longer be sensible or useful, but for now, seeing where we have been neatly explains where we are.
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$alähdekoodit $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9343
*650 7$aavoin lähdekoodi$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17089
*650 7$alisenssit$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16495$2yso/fin
*650 $aohjelmistot$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11291
*651 7$aYhdysvallat$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105078
*830 0$aHastings science & technology law journal,$x2331-835X ;$v4(2)
*85640$uhttps://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_science_technology_law_journal/vol4/iss2/5$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.