Hylly
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) 8 March 2023 – B-1974/2022 : Evaluation of Similarities of Figurative Marks with Matching Motifs – Apple Logo
Julkaistu Verlag C.H. Beck, München : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa GRUR International, ISSN 2632-8623 ; 73(3)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. 1. Likelihood of confusion must be assessed in the context of an overall consideration and against the background of the distinctiveness and reputation of the opposing marks. At the same time, an assessment must be made of the similarity of the signs. 2. The overall impression of a figurative trade mark results from the figurative motif and its creative implementation. In principle, there is only similarity if there is an overlap on both levels. 3. In the case of figurative marks with semantic content, the overall impression and distinctiveness may be determined by both the external design and the semantic content. 4. Even if both signs show the representation of a matching motif, there is no likelihood of confusion when such signs are independent creative implementations of the motif and the differences in the overall impression are clearly recognisable.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke GRUR International, 2632-8623 ; 73(3).
*000 ab a ar
*00124535
*008 s2024 gw e| |||||0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*24500$aFederal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) 8 March 2023 – B-1974/2022 :$bEvaluation of Similarities of Figurative Marks with Matching Motifs – Apple Logo /$cFederal Act of 28 August 1992 on the Protection of Trade Marks and Indications of Source, Arts. 3(1) and 31(1).
*264 1$aMünchen :$bVerlag C.H. Beck,$c2024.
*300 $as. 237–242
*336 $2rdacontent$ateksti$btxt
*337 $2rdamedia$akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn
*338 $2rdacarrier$anide$bnc
*4901 $aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v73(3)
*520 $a1. Likelihood of confusion must be assessed in the context of an overall consideration and against the background of the distinctiveness and reputation of the opposing marks. At the same time, an assessment must be made of the similarity of the signs. 2. The overall impression of a figurative trade mark results from the figurative motif and its creative implementation. In principle, there is only similarity if there is an overlap on both levels. 3. In the case of figurative marks with semantic content, the overall impression and distinctiveness may be determined by both the external design and the semantic content. 4. Even if both signs show the representation of a matching motif, there is no likelihood of confusion when such signs are independent creative implementations of the motif and the differences in the overall impression are clearly recognisable.
*650 7$atavaramerkkilaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p21904
*650 7$atavaramerkit$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1488
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$apäätökset$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2868$2yso/fin
*650 7$alogot $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3737$2yso/fin
*651 7$aSveitsi$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105295$2yso/fin
*830 0$aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v73(3).
*852 $hSA-GRUR International
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.