Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

 
Exploring the Viability of AI as Judicial Replacements : a Cautionary Perspective
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Henkilönnimi
  • Melian Pérez, Gabriel Ernesto, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Exploring the Viability of AI as Judicial Replacements : a Cautionary Perspective
Julkaistu
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Recht und Informatik e.V. (DGRI), Frankfurt am Main : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • 1 verkkoaineisto
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, ISSN 2190-3387 ; 14(4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Considering the high pace of technological development, it is not futile to wonder whether AI could ever replace judges. This work analyzes this possibility and speculates on one fundamental question: Could AI effectively replace judges in all their functions? The paper proposes a cautious view: it pleads a comprehensive conception of the judicial function, where the human judge fulfills a much more complex role than just interpreting the norm and applying it to concrete cases. AI's lack of social understanding, moral agency, and rational autonomy prevents it from performing the fundamental social governance role of the judge. It does not seem that, in most cases, AI should go beyond a purely supportive role.
Asiasana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 2190-3387 ; 14(4).
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/27 Linkki verkkoaineistoon 
*000      ab a        ar
*00124544
*008      s2024    gw     e|    |||||0|eng |            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*041  $aeng
*1001 $aMelian Pérez, Gabriel Ernesto,$ekirjoittaja.
*24514$aExploring the Viability of AI as Judicial Replacements :$ba Cautionary Perspective /$cGabriel Ernesto Melian Pérez.
*264 1$aFrankfurt am Main :$bDeutsche Gesellschaft für Recht und Informatik e.V. (DGRI),$c2024.
*300  $a1 verkkoaineisto
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $atietokonekäyttöinen$bc$2rdamedia
*338  $averkkoaineisto$bcr$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v14(4)
*520  $aConsidering the high pace of technological development, it is not futile to wonder whether AI could ever replace judges. This work analyzes this possibility and speculates on one fundamental question: Could AI effectively replace judges in all their functions? The paper proposes a cautious view: it pleads a comprehensive conception of the judicial function, where the human judge fulfills a much more complex role than just interpreting the norm and applying it to concrete cases. AI's lack of social understanding, moral agency, and rational autonomy prevents it from performing the fundamental social governance role of the judge. It does not seem that, in most cases, AI should go beyond a purely supportive role.
*650 7$atekoäly$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2616
*650 7$ateknologinen kehitys$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8956
*650 7$atuomarit (oikeus)$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17592
*650 7$apäätöksenteko$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8743
*650 7$atuomioistuinlaitos$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1499
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v14(4).
*85640$uhttps://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/27$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä