Hylly
Henkilönnimi van Eechoud, Mireille M. M., kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Territoriality and the Quest for a Unitary Copyright Title
Julkaistu Springer, Heidelberg : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 55(1)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. After 30 years of harmonization at EU level, copyright and related rights remain decidedly territorial in scope. This is despite the continuous quest for an internal market and the profound impact on cross-border creation, dissemination and use of cultural content. This contribution recounts the outcome of research done on territoriality in the context of the ReCreating Europe project. It discusses why national territorial rights persist, what type of legal mechanisms the EU legislature employs to address the adverse effects of territoriality, and sketches a number of models for a unitary title based on Art. 118 TFEU which could be explored going forward.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 55(1)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01412-w Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000 ab a ar
*00124575
*008 s2024 gw e |||| 0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $avan Eechoud, Mireille M. M.,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aTerritoriality and the Quest for a Unitary Copyright Title /$cMireille M. M. van Eechoud.
*264 1$aHeidelberg :$bSpringer,$c2024.
*300 $as. 66-88
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v55(1)
*520 $aAfter 30 years of harmonization at EU level, copyright and related rights remain decidedly territorial in scope. This is despite the continuous quest for an internal market and the profound impact on cross-border creation, dissemination and use of cultural content. This contribution recounts the outcome of research done on territoriality in the context of the ReCreating Europe project. It discusses why national territorial rights persist, what type of legal mechanisms the EU legislature employs to address the adverse effects of territoriality, and sketches a number of models for a unitary title based on Art. 118 TFEU which could be explored going forward.
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$alähioikeudet$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11910$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*650 7$asisämarkkinat $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2824
*650 7$alakien yhdenmukaistaminen$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p28637$2yso/fin
*653 $aterritoriality
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v55(1)
*852 $hSA-IIC
*856 $uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01412-w$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.